mweper's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175928895 | 5 days ago | "alt_name:related_law": That sounds fine to me. I didn't know that the order of this label affected the meaning of the labeling. |
| 175928895 | 5 days ago | Hello Mueschel. Why did you change the label from “related_law:alt_name” to just “related_law”? This could lead to confusion, as it suggests that the related law refers to the street in general and not specifically to the alternative name given to it. In other words, “related_law:alt_name” is more specific because it refers only to the “alt_name” and not to all the characteristics of the road. |
| 175893965 | 6 days ago | Perdón, es con @serock que puso la nota. |
| 175893965 | 6 days ago | Hola xrosarinox.
|
| 175589168 | 12 days ago | Ya se encuentra mapeado el club aquí: relation/6888747 Por favor, no duplicar elementos en el mapa. Se elimina nodo duplicado y se actualizan datos en el área correspondiente. Saludos. |