OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
94601232 about 5 years ago

The owners of the property are fine with this level of detail. There are no privacy concerns.

The BBQ exists and has the plaque with the inscription. I helpfully included a photo link.
Further more it was tagged access=private!

88377877 over 5 years ago

Not sure this really exists!

64115642 over 6 years ago

Hi, Just wondering why you've deleted many objects to create new ones at the same location but lacking in house numbers, postcodes etc? You also appear to be changing the building:levels, The houses you've put in as 1.5 are all 2 stories above ground level.

66093263 over 6 years ago

Okay, I've undeleted the PoI and marked it as disused.

66093263 over 6 years ago

Hi, just wondering why you deleted this object rather than marking it as disused, or at least preserver the address details?

It is helpful to do this as if/when they reopen the history and details are preserved. The White Swan has open and closed a few times in the past already!

64891870 almost 7 years ago

Please revert this, the Bing streetside imginary is very old, if you look at recent imaginary or walk down there you will see there is now a road way and a new development on what was once waste ground.

56670721 about 7 years ago

Are you sure about the path between 46 and 44? I had a wander round there today and it looks as if the path is just to the north of 52.

55667018 over 7 years ago

why did you delete these nodes rather than set them as disused and thus preserving the history and the address data?

51910402 over 7 years ago

Why do you think way/523329368 is a farm yard rather than residential?? what source did you use for this edit?

52035887 over 7 years ago

Hi there, I just walked over here,
what source did you use for instance for way/524643648 ? It doesn't seem to exist on the ground, and is very unlikely to have even 7 months ago.

56503374 almost 8 years ago

yep fixed up thanks