Thanks for doing this work!

Hi thanks for improving the map, but please can you check relations you may be accidentally breaking when doing edits like this? relation/318579 is now split into several parts. see also http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=318579

thanks

bill

oops, corrected to fire hydrant!

Mapping is a multi-stage process.
I was on the ground adding detail that could easily be added with the tools I had, in the time I had.

If you feel these edits have little worth, feel free improve them, you should be able to infer stuff like
addr:place=Siberstein etc.

Maybe if you're in the area you could find other detail I may have missed during my walk through.

cheers
bill

There is a specific bike entrance turning from Castle Street, but oneway:bicycle=no is not related to the existence or not of cycle lanes.

Did you actually survey this?, You appear to have removed the oneway:bicycle=no on park row.

I don't think leisure=pitch was totally unreasonable in the way that recreation ground for an area where people are going to be discharging high energy projectiles clearly is.
The edit by User Hemmers doesn't seem unreasonable given it was fixing the use of military tags and pitch was already used for various other shooting areas in the uk, some of which you've changed in the same changeset!

Are you saying you blindly changed every use of leisure=pitch without looking at what you were changing sorry if i have misunderstood?

way/28687269/history as an example. but you seem to have changed loads of other shooting ranges to that in this changeset.

a recreation ground inside a danger area relation, seems slightly inappropriate(!), oh and you missed off fee=yes ;-)

The owners of the property are fine with this level of detail. There are no privacy concerns.

The BBQ exists and has the plaque with the inscription. I helpfully included a photo link.
Further more it was tagged access=private!

Not sure this really exists!

Hi, Just wondering why you've deleted many objects to create new ones at the same location but lacking in house numbers, postcodes etc? You also appear to be changing the building:levels, The houses you've put in as 1.5 are all 2 stories above ground level.

Okay, I've undeleted the PoI and marked it as disused.

Hi, just wondering why you deleted this object rather than marking it as disused, or at least preserver the address details?

It is helpful to do this as if/when they reopen the history and details are preserved. The White Swan has open and closed a few times in the past already!

Please revert this, the Bing streetside imginary is very old, if you look at recent imaginary or walk down there you will see there is now a road way and a new development on what was once waste ground.

Are you sure about the path between 46 and 44? I had a wander round there today and it looks as if the path is just to the north of 52.

why did you delete these nodes rather than set them as disused and thus preserving the history and the address data?

Why do you think way/523329368 is a farm yard rather than residential?? what source did you use for this edit?

Hi there, I just walked over here,
what source did you use for instance for way/524643648 ? It doesn't seem to exist on the ground, and is very unlikely to have even 7 months ago.

yep fixed up thanks