mavl's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 173406281 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173960990 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173919059 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173572590 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173701491 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173526591 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173002144 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173745320 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173705154 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173916498 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173537577 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173532110 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173670332 | about 1 month ago | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping]. |
| 173888221 | about 1 month ago | Здравствуйте. Вы испортили название улицы на карте. Ваши изменения отменены. Пожалуйста, добавляйте на карту только то, что есть в действительности.
|
| 174226303 | about 1 month ago | Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, информация для тегов
|
| 174095115 | about 1 month ago | Спасибо. |
| 174159847 | about 2 months ago | Спасибо. |
| 174159847 | about 2 months ago | Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет на отношение и на его внешний контур один и тот же тег (landuse=farmland). Это старый стиль оформления мультиполигонов. Сейчас тег ставят только на само отношение, поэтому различные валидаторы будут указывать на ошибку.
|
| 174095115 | about 2 months ago | Правильно так, как было раньше. Это один дом на две квартиры. Один контур и две адресные точки (внутри здания или на здании). |
| 174095115 | about 2 months ago | Пропустил слово в предложении. Почему один дом был разделён на два? |