Hi Skyper,
Thanks for the feedback. Can you please help me locating the oneway road you are talking about? As from the aerial view I am unable to figure out the exact road.
Regards,
mathpras.

Hi PT-53,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added highway=service as I am not sure of the type of the entity it is leading to. Thanks for the feedback. please find the changeset(102789804) for the suggested modification. Always happy to learn from the community
Regards,
mathpras

Hi Rainero,
Thanks for the response. I have used the bing imagery to make the edits. By "available OSM resources" we mean the Imagery's and street level imagery's available on OSM. If you are referring to the separate source section, currently we are adding source whenever we use internal resources like private imagery's. PFB changeset changeset/102414321 with the source section for reference.
Regards,
mathpras

Hi Rainero,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the roads based on the driver feedback and available OSM resources. please let me know if it is contradicting with the ground reality. Kindly suggest me with the appropriate highway tag so that I can make the necessary changes. Always happy to learn from the community

Hi,
Thanks for your valuable feedback. I will make sure to implement your suggestions in our future edits. Always happy to learn from the community

Hello,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the edits based on the available OSM resources. I have not added driveway as I don't have enough evidence to validate the edit. Thanks for the confirmation. It is good to see the local community improvising our edits. Please find the changeset (100759389) for the suggested modifications. Always happy to learn from the community.

Hello,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the edits as per the available imagery. thanks for improving our edit quality with the local knowledge. please find the changeset(100713449) for the suggested edits. always happy to learn from the community

Hi,
As per Bing aerial imagery there is a newly constructed entity (way/912562338). We have added the segment to access the entity as per the latest imagery. In Bing Imagery it looks like there is a way to access the entity from (way/34844188). Hence, we have digitized the complete connection. As mentioned above please confirm if the edit in the snip (https://snipboard.io/xouFeO.jpg) is correct. We will go ahead and make the changes as per your suggestion. Thanks for your active response.
Regards,
mathpras

Hello,
We don't add roads in OSM based on our internal driver traces, but only use GPS traces to identify missing roads. We purely add roads based on imageries available in OSM. We do not wish to share our customer address in an open forum like this. We have added the road as per Bing aerial imagery as it is comparatively the latest imagery available on OSM. There seems to be a connection at (node/8482418739). However, Thanks for your Constructive feedback. Please find the snip(https://snipboard.io/xouFeO.jpg) as per our understanding of the error that you have mentioned. Kindly, confirm so that we can go ahead and make the changes accordingly. Always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
mathpras

Hi,
My sincere apologies for the miss from my end. I have added the segment based on Bing aerial imagery but missed the gate at the entry . I have re verified and added gate and access based on private maxar imagery. please find the changeset for your reference (100490897). Thanks for your valuable feedback.
Regards,
mathpras

Hi Flo,
Thanks for looking into my edit. I have added a track road as per the parent road classification. But yes, As you have told there are entities and the road is suitable for other type of vehicles as well. I have modified the segments as per your suggestion(changeset:100017384). Always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
mathpras

Hi,
Thanks for checking onto our edits. I have added the service road as we not have enough evidence to change the highway tag. thanks for your feedback. its good to see the community improvising our edits. please find the changeset(99590128) with the suggested modifications. Always happy to learn from the community

Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset(99510137) for the suggested modifications

Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset(99507442) for the suggested modifications

Hello,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have not modified the existing tag as we don't have the supporting evidence to make the changes. thanks for your inputs. please find the changeset(99487866) for the suggested modifications. Always happy to learn from the community

Hello, thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, I have accidentally added the node. please find the changeset for the suggested correction. going forward, I will make sure retain the existing features while adding new roads. always happy to learn from the community
New Changeset- 95281679

“Hi naveenpf, Thanks for the response. we are delighted to be a part of #hotosm-project and looking for more opportunities to work with you soon”

Hi there, Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the customers tag based on the type of building it is leading to. Thanks for your valuable feedback. I am changing the access to private based on the community suggestion. Please find the changeset(90563171) for the suggested modifications. Let me know in case of any more modifications required. Always happy to learn from the community

Hi,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added a driveway with private access as the road is leading to a house and as per the previous suggestions received from the community. please let me know if it is contradicting with the ground reality, so that i will make the necessary changes. always happy to learn from the community

Hi,
Thanks for correcting the road direction. Apologies for incorrectly adding the direction to the secondary road. I shall be watchful of such edits hereafter.
Thanks again for your correction & help!
Looking forward to learning from you.
Regards,
mathpras.