Why has way/995869124 been tagged as parking aisle? Seems to be a path or a track.

Thanks.

Why have ways 25694104, 25694054, etc. been tagged as bicycle=no?

Almost two months later and no response despite you making further edits since then, so I've reverted this changeset and fixed the incorrect double ford from 135664925. See 138083984.

What is the reasoning behind adding bicycle=yes to this one, very specific, section of grass footpath?

Looks like a building=yes has been lost along the way. It isn't rendering.

Haven't had a response, so I've reverted these changes in changeset/129402408.

Why have you made these changes to Colwyn Road? It isn't one way between Seal Road and Valley Road as you have mapped. There's a no entry sign to vehicles near the the junction with Valley Road, which I mapped using a very short section of one way road (way/1091941908) quite recently. Making this much larger section of the road one way is incorrect.

Indeed, which makes it even more perplexing that you spent time changing sport pitches to recreation grounds, even when it doesn't make sense to do so.

You could see it was edited only hours earlier, a note or message would have been rather more useful than a drive-by tag change on something that will need fixing whether it's made a recreation ground or a sport pitch.

The area was quickly mapped months ago, and I have plans to make it accurate when I can, which will be very soon. But the help is much appreciated.

Many cricket pitches are mapped this way, if it's supposed to be round then why didn't you do that? Changing it to a recreation ground has made the database less accurate and fixed nothing.

I spent time adding detail to this sports club earlier today, you might have reached out before editing it.

Why has way/1068311327 been changed from a sports pitch to a recreation ground? It accurately maps a cricket field and sits within a sports centre, it doesn't seem to make any sense.

Still no reply, so I performed a revert. See changeset/127256445.

I haven't done one before but I will have a go.

Thanks for that, Marc. It seems the changes were made based on Bing satellite imagery from 2011. The area has changed significantly since then. I'm not sure why SavageRainbow chose this specific section of the airport to edit, hopefully they will reply now.

Why have you done this? None of this is correct

I agree, but presumably they haven't seen this so someone else will have to fix it eventually. I have no strong preference which one is kept, the shared use path alongside the A555 which connects to this is also mapped as a separate cycle track, so there is some precedent.

I'm well aware of that, the feature was mapped some time ago. staffordstafford has since mapped it for a second time, so it now shows up twice on the cycle layers, and one needs removing.

I'm not seeing that, cycleway:left=track and cycleway:right=track have been used appropriately so the cycle map layer and CyclOSM are rendering it correctly.

This is already mapped using the cycleway=track tag. One of them needs removing