julcnx's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 107950694 | over 4 years ago | My apologies, I have used the wrong imagery. I still changed to service, as most likely within private land.
|
| 107950694 | over 4 years ago | There is no clear road on satellite, geometry overlays buildings. Likely not residential. Reverting change
|
| 109437102 | over 4 years ago | Please use "name" for local language (Thai) and
|
| 109125462 | over 4 years ago | FYI. Please kindly refrain from changing highway classifications and see guidelines for new additions https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/96#issuecomment-894739078 |
| 109260695 | over 4 years ago | This is clearly a residential road.
|
| 109307018 | over 4 years ago | thank you, I have added corrections to the bridge, and marked the road as residential as cars can access it.
|
| 107949314 | over 4 years ago | Please refrain from adding residential roads within farming estate.
|
| 102482038 | over 4 years ago | Please refrain from adding residential roads inside a religious site. You must use service for roads with any private property/facility/estate. If you are not sure, please do not add/tag. thank you https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
|
| 107972463 | over 4 years ago | please refrain from adding geometries without a clear path. In this occurrence, one end has noexit=yes and from satellite, there is no clear line going all the way |
| 107972420 | over 4 years ago | Please refrain from adding long service road based on imagery satellite without local knowledge. From satellite view, road main purpose is access to agricultural fields. |
| 107955754 | over 4 years ago | You added a road that does not exist. Please refrain from adding poor-quality changes.
|
| 109205700 | over 4 years ago | Hope all is well. Would you mind please to always add a surface to track? (unpaved/paved if you are not sure of the exact type). Grab is currently upgrading the minor road network in Thailand and turning a lot of farming and village tracks into highway=residential and others
https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines/blob/main/README.md#add-surface-tag-important Much appreciated.
|
| 108007637 | over 4 years ago | How do you justify way/911546988 to be residential while there is no permanent residence along and the main purpose of the area is forestry?
|
| 109120188 | over 4 years ago | Please make smaller change subsets. Each changeset should be within a small geographical area (e.g. 100km max), so it's easier for others to review changes.
|
| 102607919 | over 4 years ago | Please refrain from curving sharp corners: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/49#issuecomment-739779345 |
| 107946829 | over 4 years ago | Bad tagging. Source tag missing. The whole area is private farm. Please correct accordingly. |
| 108254704 | over 4 years ago | I do not see a source tag so I assume you used Bing. The highway=path you added should be classified as track I believe. If you use recent satellite images like Maxar, it is pretty clear. From my experience, paths are rarely visible from satellite, when they are they stay as a thin line when zoomed in, unlike double tracks. |
| 108014122 | over 4 years ago | How can this be classified as residential? Does a single house at the beginning justify a residential tag? |
| 108530447 | over 4 years ago | Hi. No pb. Do you have any OSM guidelines document at GRABOSM you could share with me? Anything about classifications, geometries. e.g. when do you decide to use residential/unclassified/track/service? This would help a lot to prevent mismatches and save both sides a lot of time.
|
| 108199956 | over 4 years ago | seriously, bad changes?
|