Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55331218

Hi Aaron, Thanks for all the detail. Question about the road hierarchy. How closely do you model the OSM roads to the 'official' hierarchy as defined by the government in WA?

Hi,
Was looking at this boundary relation for Melbourne. Is this a standard statistical boundary or did you stitch it together from the localities? Thx.

Reverting. This is just a spam edit.

I'm going to revert the edit back to West 29th ST

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for the contribution. It looks like you changed the street name from West 29th Street to Sign Services. Are you sure the street name here has changed? Or was that your intention?

Are you sure about this one?: Way: A Lo Fucker (407769782)
It gets picked up in our profanity filter and we can't find any other corroborating source for this as a legitimate business.

But it's not actually the Worlds Biggest Penis. It's a monument, but I suppose if the name is accurate than it belongs labeled on the map.

Hi samden,
This way got caught in our profanity filter: Way: World Bigest Penis (246696667). Is it a legitimate monument? Why would the primary name be in English and not south Korean? Not saying it's wrong, but there are many other monuments at that location with Korean names where this one is especially called out. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Land_(South_Korea)

You added 'Shitpalace' as part of this changeset. Is there really something there named 'Shitpalace'?? way(128624971)

This is clearly on the wrong spot. No way a ferry terminal is this far inland. The web site cited in the source shows a completely different location. Please fix. Thanks!

We run a profanity filter through the OSM data that flags potentially offensive words. We're interested in weeding out vandalism not removing legitimate edits. Thx.

Hi, this particular node got caught in our filter (node/4238370274). Are you sure this is correct?

I just removed the water feature altogether. I can't think of a suitable alternative. It's like a seasonal lake that isn't really a lake at all. Maybe an alternate name tag for Lake Ballard?

This is a flooded construction site but definitely not natural=water. It's only flooded in the winter anyway. Even though the site is known locally as lake Ballard, the tag is incorrect.

Hi, I was just looking in this area and so the pipeline. How do you know it's really there, can't see it from the imagery? Thx.

Hi,

I've been trying to clean up some of the state boundaries. You tagged this park with an Admin_level=4 which is normally reserved for state boundaries. boundary=administrative

The rest of it looks great though!

Hey Pete,
I've been trying to clean up some of the state boundary issue. You tagged this one as an Admin_level=4 which is normally reserved for a state.
boundary=administrative

The rest of it looks awesome.
-jubal

Hi, I was looking at boundaries in Washington and this one keeps coming up. Are state park boundaries intended to be tagged as Admin_level=4? These are normally reserved for state boundaries.

Noticed that you mapped a proposed highway (way=297430771). Normally only map things that are verifiable on the ground. Also not visible on Bing imgaery.