javbw's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 116683736 | almost 4 years ago | There are very crude polygons here. please use "Q" to sQuare your buildings. |
| 110588826 | almost 4 years ago | yep - the wirefarme shortcut in iD is "w" - and I accidently stick it on things. Thanks for catching this one! |
| 77771048 | over 4 years ago | the more I look, the more bad mapping I find. Please do not edit any cycleways or pedestrian paths. |
| 77771048 | over 4 years ago | This entire changeset should be reverted. Do not map cycleways as paths. |
| 106634403 | over 4 years ago | There must be a tag of some sort, because the road signs make the legal distinction. |
| 106634403 | over 4 years ago | Here’s some pictures and further description The width is a physical barrier, (usually with huge concrete chokers to keep 5 ton trucks from trying to sneak into somewhere they shouldn’t), but all of the tags I am adding are signed legal restrictions - they are signed with common road signs (and amendment /exception signs below them) present everywhere in Japan. They are standard and mass produced, so I assume they have a common national road law behind their implementation. Regardless, the access restrictions are signed by the city/prefecture, so it is a mappable trait not dependent on width. Width is hard to catch while cycling 😉 Here are some pics of two kinds of these narrow mixed access grade crossings, a “small and special okay” and two other “2-wheel only” crossings present on the Tobu & Jomo lines here in Kiryu on my way home. I just took them for this post: - regular crossing - no restrictions.
There are hundreds of these types of crossing in each prefecture. - no motorcar, bollard/post present, “2 wheels” excepted (scooters): ped/ bicycle/ scooter access. Ped only: rare - only foot and bikes : Often has a cycle barrier to force dismount/caution - and stop scooters - not to actually prevent bicycle access. This is to keep noisy bikes from taking shortcuts around signals/traffic in some places. - ped only - no bicycles either, as the crossing has stairs to access it on one end, and more convenient crossings exist for bikes - pretty dang rare. I have only seen one or two. |
| 106634403 | over 4 years ago | I made it up on the spot because the signs don't say "kei car" (軽自動車) which is a class of vehicle for tax purposes , they say "small special vehicles exempted." ( 小特除く ). I was planning to use it on other similar crossings. These tiny grade crossings that are not purposefully for pedestrians (they would have a bollard or be ~1M wide) are for local access for tractors and kei trucks to avoid having to go the long way around, yet narrow enough to physically restrict most vehicles wider than a regular sedan (so all white-plate regular cars are legally restricted). Other narrow crossings have chokers in place to stop HGV from taking shortcuts on roads they can't fit on (or are a bother), but are wide enough for regular vehicles, like the two just to the east of this one. I have now changed the access on this port to kei=yes and agricultural=designated. |
| 92714996 | over 4 years ago | Still finding garbage data. This changeset should be deleted. |
| 92714996 | over 4 years ago | level crossing points points are disconnected from the railways and all should be deleted. The ones in my area are all duplicates as well, and unnecessary. |
| 82239785 | over 5 years ago | bad mapping of the cycleway. deleted and redrew. wrong side of the street and missed many crossing roads. |
| 83235841 | over 5 years ago | No, it was on purpose. It’s a possible tag or a placeholder until I find the right one. I added it because I needed to look up how to tag “小” vehicles. A lot of the train crossings ban:
I used kei= as a Placeholder in this case. If I can’t get a proper access tag, I will propose “kei” as an access tag for Japanese tagging. Javbw |
| 81903173 | over 5 years ago | thanks for the mistake correction! |
| 81017725 | almost 6 years ago | this changeset includes very badly mapped sidewalks. |
| 49474072 | almost 6 years ago | more badly mapped ghost tracks and roads mis-tagged to be tracks. |
| 48767667 | almost 6 years ago | more random tracks drawn over drains. all the random tracks need to be deleted. |
| 48776651 | almost 6 years ago | there are many nonexistent tracks and other ways mapped that do not exist mapped over drains. I am doing my best to clean up all these garbage ways. |
| 66694479 | almost 6 years ago | bad editing. |
| 78951828 | almost 6 years ago | *bannaji |
| 49670208 | about 6 years ago | This changeset, like so many, mis-map residential and alley roads as tracks. I am working hard to undo all of this bad mapping. |
| 64255426 | almost 7 years ago | This is garbage mapping. |