I was looking at some point adding this, thanks. Also if you know the extent of the subdivision you could plot that out as residential area.

Also, you can look at the county parcel info for more detail since there are a few additional streets mentioned.

http://maps.stlouisco.com/propertyview/

I actually see a couple of areas wehre it looks like it might go outside the box, tough the park tag would be appropriate for the county owned land.

http://maps.stlouisco.com/propertyview/

here is a parcel map for the county, so you can see who owns each spot which could get the boundaries down right. Also, the fine details there is a phone app that is helpful for doing that, I have done it for details in parks near me and there is a gps tracing tool on it that could help in mapping the trails based on your hiking hon them.

I might be able to help on cleaning this up since the park should be seperate from the woods. Here is the boundaries of the park.

http://www.stlouisco.com/ParksandRecreation/Trails/ChampTrails

Wanted to note, it looks like the westernmost woods mapping from what i can tell may be more accurately rendered as scrub due to trees don't cover a forest canopy but more overgrown than a grassland

No problem. I see this park along my commute and know of a few other features in the area. You can see too some added detail i did a few days ago in and near Des Peres Park.

I might be able to help improve this park and some of the nearby area since its near my work and could stop there for lunch and be able to fill in more details.

This slip lane that you added was removed a couple of years ago. It is no longer present due to construction of the Danforth Plant Science Center (not rendered as of yet).

Wanted to let you know i cleaned up some areas around here to add some more detail and based on OSM standards.You can take a look at what has been added. Eventually plan on doing a number of nearby changes due to mapping errors in the area and update information.

I went in and added a few more things for you and to set it based on what standards are for OSM. Went and mapped the subdivision boundaries since i'm familiar with it based on my knowledge of the area.

I noticed that the park from what i can tell is actually larger than indicated. Also, there is no need to tag the playground and baseball use with the area due to its defined in another area which is standard. I can also help add a few more details in this area to flesh it out.

Is this an actual park? It seems that a more accurate description would be to have it labeled as landuse=grass . Also I noticed there's a number of little tagging errors in the area I could also clean up some to compliment this along with adding a couple of visible features nearby

I was about to do this myself, thank you. I work nearby and have added a number of parks and detail in them, but unable to get an idea on this one. Might get by there in the near future to fully delineate park boundaries and add details, since there seems to be a few trails that aren't mapped out yet in the area.

Is the traffic circle on 13th Street a roundabout? Since if so it could be converted into one since theres an easy tutorial on how to do it.

Oh good, I was going to eventually get to this as I work on my commute route and this being along it. I recently fixed the 141/44 intersection to have it show current situation and work under construction. Also starting to update the nearby shopping areas to reflect current stores.

Thanks. I was having some challenges getting the borders right since i've noticed county lines are for some reason in the area off quite a bit and the city limits were wrong in a few places which could be old info.

And learned a bit too on the layer function on bridges.

Ah, wasn't sure. I can touch up some of the places at that intersection and Pacific since i'm familiar with them since i pass by daily as work commute. Pacific was one of the next places i'm adding info in due to it being next along commute to add and almost nothing is mapped there.

I noticed a few errors relating to the placement of a few objects at the 44/100 West intersection. The Phillips 66 is in the wrong place and was already on the map. also some other features could be easily converted from points to area features.

Want some help in adding to the park in some nearby areas for more details?

I might be able to help touch up some lines and details to these parks and throw in a few buildings in the area as well.