Hi,
[Responding on behalf of shsahit since the editor no more works for the organisation.]
The edit was made based on Bing aerial imagery. Also, The Roewood lane was already existing as per OS Open data street view. Please feel free to improve the edits in case of any discrepancies.
Thanks.
Hemasvn

Hi Phil,
Thanks for looking into our edit. The editor is out of Organization (osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Amazon#Previous_users). Hence, Replying on behalf of him. Looks like the editor hasn't considered the road width and misinterpreted the segment to be a service road. We genuinely apologize for this miss from our end. I have made the changes as per Bing Aerial Imagery(changeset:105301033). Always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
hemasvn

Hi Allinson,
Apologies for the miss from our end. We have modified the access = customers . changeset #: 99293022
Regards,
hemasvn

Hi Allinson,
Apologies for the miss from our end. We have modified the access = customers . changeset #: 99292853
Regards,
hemasvn

Hi Allinson,
Thanks for your feedback on our edits. We have modified the access to customers as per your suggestion. (99292693)
Regards,
hemasvn

Hi Allinson,
Thanks for your feedback on our edits. We have modified the access to customers as per your suggestion.
Regards,
hemasvn

Hi user_5121,
As mentioned in the note as there is a sign board at the gate stating "Rear Gate entry to the house is from Aston Lane" I have modified the highway tag. Thanks for improving the edit as per ground reality. Always Happy to learn from the community.
Advance Happy New year!
Regards,
hemasvn

Hi Limes,
Thanks for your detailed feedback. As mentioned by you formally 861070474 is not a one way. but based on lane markings the entry is prohibited, So would you suggest us to make a small part one way in these situations or should we add relations of " No left turn" or "No right Turn".
Kindly, let us know your feedback on this.
Regards,
Hema

Hi Limes11,
Apologies for the delay in reply, I have made the edit based on available Mapillary overlay (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=a9-qjdOw5LYZOEzZUdFPlw&focus=photo) according to the sign board the directions apply from the junction. also the Previous oneway was restricting right turn from (Wilhelmstraße to Bahnhofstraße). Kindly, let me know if i am missing out on anything. Always happy to learn from community and improve our edits.

Regrds,
Hema

Hi,
Thanks for checking into our edits. We have received the feedback from our driver that the road is accessible by motor vehicles, cross verified the same with the available resources and made the edit. We are not sure of the exact sign board, we left a note to the community asking for the additional improvements if any. It will be really helpful if the local knowledge can validate our edits. please, suggest the required modifications. Always happy to learn form the community.

appreciating your time for looking into our edits. We are making our edits based on our driver feedback and valuable suggestions from the community. Please go through the changeset (83478739) for the suggested edits. Do let me know in case of any further changes required. always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
hemasvn

"Thanks for your response. We just cross verified osm wiki again to improve our edits regarding paths . it was mentioned as "" highway=path is a generic path, either multi-use or unspecified usage, open to all non-motorized vehicles and not intended for motorized vehicles unless tagged so separately. The path may have any type of surface.

This includes walking and hiking trails, bike trails and paths, horse and stock trails, mountain bike trails as well as combinations of the above.""(highway=path), it is stating path includes walking, horse, bike trails, etc. Do you suggest to add a note in every scenario where we change the segment to path, in presence of bollard or stick with the wiki? Please suggest us the appropriate edits that can be reflected in all such cases. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
hemasvn

Hi ndm,
Thanks for your time for checking our edits. We have added a path since there is no proper evidence to specify as it as foot/cycle path. Can you suggest any possible resolution in these kind of cases. Please let me know in case of any further edits.
Regards,
hemasvn

thanks for checking my edits. Modified the building position to avoid overlapping with the service road. Not sure of positioning the POI accurately without being supported by ground reality. it can be helpful if local knowledge can improve our edits. Please let me know in case of any further modifications.
Regards,
hemasvn

Hi tux67,

Thanks for looking into my edit. This edit was based upon the GPS trace of our driver partner. However, i understand your concern about this edit. Let me know in case I need to modify the edit as per the local knowledge. Looking forward to learn and add valuable data in the maps!
Regards
hemasvn
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74633301

Hi tux67,
Thanks for looking into this. This is an honest mistake and i have corrected it as per your suggestion. I will be more careful going forward and would not repeat such errors. Let me know in case you have any more suggestions.

Regards
hemasvn

Hi kreuzschnabel,

Thanks for the update. We will follow as per your suggestion going forward. We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.

Regards,
hemasvn

Hi kreuzschnabel,

Thanks for looking into my edits. I have made this edit based on the satellite imagery which is not very clear. I looked into the mapillary where I identified a do not enter board but overlooked the road directionality. As per your suggestion I am reverting the change and will keep a keen eye on my edits going forward. Do let me know if you have any further questions.

changeset:# 71985626

Regards,
hemasvn

Hi,

Thanks for your suggestion. As per you request I am reverting back my edits made on access tags. Do let me know if you have any further questions.

Changeset #71940643
Regards,
hemasvn

Hi,

Thanks for your suggestion. As per you request I am reverting back my edits made on access tags. Do let me know if you have any further questions.

Changeset #71851898
Regards,
hemasvn