OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
77507917 almost 6 years ago

I'm not sure what happened here, but these two businesses have received tagging as ToysRUs and BabiesRUs (which I don't think exist any more) rather than H Mart and Office Depot. Could you double-check your work?

76834116 about 6 years ago

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I was looking through the Tesla Motors Club thread, saw your link, decided to investigate.

In the way/743165216 parking lot, all four of the one-way roads go southbound, causing all of way/743463750 to be unroutable. Surely at least one of them goes northbound or is two-way? Also, no need to designate node/6949821352 or node/6949821358 as parking, the overall area (for which parking=surface might be valid) is enough.

There's more advice available if you're interested.

71350009 over 6 years ago

It seemed like an awkward name, but it's what was lettered on the window.

68248145 over 6 years ago

Corrected via Changeset #70845599

68248145 over 6 years ago

Most of these, if not all, are vacant (although many do still have their old signage); the main exception being the fuel station. They should not have had their shop or amenity tags restored/duplicated.

70415762 over 6 years ago

This should've been tagged with source=survey and imagery_used=Bing aerial imagery.

51258747 almost 7 years ago

I see that some tags (cutting, embankment) got changed from "yes" values to "true" values. Can they be returned to "yes" to match other tags?

60052056 over 7 years ago

If the PDF ("10 cm") is incorrect, please revert this changeset.

57500125 over 7 years ago

source=survey (I forgot to add that.)

57411324 over 7 years ago

Also removed TIGER tags (it's quite reviewed) and added surface=asphalt.

1464427 almost 8 years ago

I'd just like to state, for the record, that I have no objection to these houses being overwritten by improved geometry. The imagery with which I was working at the time was poor (pre-Bing I think) and I don't think I squared any buildings.