Hi, thanks for the space correction, however permit was correct, not permissive.

For the other cases, it makes sense, since there are probably other things on upper floors of the same building.

Hello.

I think the Covered Market units should not be tagged as buildings, and there is no reason to map the shops as a separate nodes, when the current polygons already provide more information and more accurate mapping.

Hello. Are there any restaurant premises at this address? If not, I think it should be tagged as craft=caterer, not amenity=restaurant.

craft=caterer

Thanks.

Same comment here as here: changeset/167373137#map=18/51.753797/-1.260346&layers=N

I can revert those deletions, if you want. Can you confirm whether those places are all vacant? Or have they been replaced?

Thank you.

Hello.
Please do not delete nodes, if the physical place is still there. If the shop or restaurant is gone, it can be tagged as vacant or disused (see the wiki). That makes updating much easier and preserves the history.

If both are still present, then we need two separate nodes.

This Fusion Arts is in Gloucester Green.
If it has relocated to Park End Street, then the old node should be updated (as vacant or new occupier) and a new one created in the new location.

Also, the one you linked is not here.

Hi. Points of interest and amenities mapped as independent nodes located inside a building object should not have a building tag.

Hello. I had reverted your previous changeset, based on my comment here: changeset/167137992
Let me know if you think it makes sense. Thanks.

Hi. Oxford is already the main "name" tag, so this doesn't add anything. I suppose the previous short_name could have been helpful in some searches which are able to take the area into account (Railway Station, Oxford).

Hi. The church was demolished more than a century ago. The surviving tower is not a place of worship.

Hi. Welcome to OSM! And thanks for your contribution.

When uploading a changeset, please use the comment description to inform others on what you did. Writing "hi" is not helpful.

For more information, please see: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
The wiki contains other helpful pages for a new mapper.

Thanks. Best wishes.

Hi. Is there any physical barrier remaining?
If not, both barrier=gate and the bollard tags should be removed. Maybe a traffic chocker?
The little segment now tagged as a bridleway should also be a normal road (with the appropriate access tags).

Grazie.

A riguardo, ci sono tre aspetti principali che possono essere descritti nei tag di OpenStreetMap:
1. Il tipo di edificio fisico, ad esempio building=hut, building=cabin, building=house.
2. Il tipo di servizio offerto, per esempio tourism=alpine_hut (per un rifugio gestito da personale), tourism=wilderness_hut (per un rifugio/bivacco senza personale), tourism=chalet (per un bed & breakfast che si può affittare su prenotazione).
3. A chi è accessibile, quindi access=yes o access=private.
(Poi tag aggiuntivi possono descrivere altre caratteristiche o servizi offerti).

Questa Baita Nòva quindi funziona ancora come "wilderness_hut" (rifugio senza personale), ma ad uso esclusivo privato e non aperta al più ampio pubblico (quindi access=private).
Altri rifugi descritti con access=private sono disponibili al pubblico, ma bisogna chiedere le chiavi.
Si può dire che la differenza fra una "wilderness_hut" ad uso privato, e una baita completamente privata (ad esempio in un alpeggio, o una seconda casa in montagna) può essere sottile. Comunque ora sembra descritta accuratamente nei tag.

Ciao.

Thank you for spotting that. Yes, it was certainly a typo. I have changed it to private only, since it looks like parking for the school.

Apologies, I meant that taxis are allowed during the day, not at night. The logic for the values is the same though.

Hi.
Last time I checked, taxis could use Speedwell/Norfolk Street only at night (hence the taxi:conditional value). Therefore, it's either psv=yes + taxi=no, or psv=no + bus=yes/designated.

No signs, I think.