gdt 的评论
| 变更集 | 时间 | 评论 |
|---|---|---|
| 59365356 | 15日前 | This node is seriously in the wrong place. Was the restaurant really on the corner of Washington and Washington Court in May of 2018? I have moved it to the actual location based on on-the-ground survey. |
| 157669195 | 3个月前 | What "city map"? What is the copyright status/license of it? How can I look at it? |
| 168894908 | 3个月前 | According to the MassDOT data set as shown in MassMapper, Meadow Pond is a public road, with a 35' right of way. It may be that the marking is improper, which would not change access. I'll see about contacting Concord, after finishing up with Acton :-) |
| 168851441 | 3个月前 | L3 parcels shows Anthem Way and the other 3 as a public right of way. I intend to inquire of the town; it seems that either L3 parcels is wrong or the signs are improper. |
| 167759001 | 3个月前 | Can you link to "Meadow Pond"? I can't find it. I will check the signage on Anthem Way next time I go by. |
| 167759001 | 3个月前 | OSM has a confused doctrine, visible on the ground out of one side of its mouth, and a strong focus on the English "public rights of way" out of the other. In the US (at least in MA), public rights of way are verifiable at the registry of deeds. So I think access tags should follow what the actual legal situation is. OSM also has a tradition of tagging signs, representing exactly what the sign said, whether or not what is on it is true, and whether the person who put it up is acting properly or not. The case of Anthem Way is curious, and I'll follow up with the Acton Planning board. It could be that L3 is wrong here, and it's easy enough to request the subdivision plan, special permit, or comprehensive permit as those are all public records. |
| 167759001 | 3个月前 | In this case, the Ridgewood and Westview in Stow are shown as carved out from the condo property. |
| 167759001 | 3个月前 | Thanks for working on this. I had a note to fix Regency, and am glad you did. To figure out if a road is a "real road", which in MA means either a "public way" or a "private way" (easement for the public to pass, but is not necessarily maintained by the government) or something "not a road" such as a driveway, the best resource is "L3 Parcels" or "Tax Parcels" which shows legal roads as carved out spaces. |
| 164082063 | 3个月前 | It looks like you moved a bunch of nodes when you added the wikidata tag. Is that what you think happened, and If so I wonder why? |
| 151517759 | 3个月前 | I just noticed this (adding the cell antenna), and "residential" seemed wrong, as L3 Parcels show it not as a legal street. So I have changed it to service. The change to residential was long ago, in a huge changeset, with a gibberish comment, referencing Bing -- which makes no sense. Can you explain the name? Is there a road name? Is this way used for anything other than water/cell-tower access? Is there a gate? Surely this is locked and access private but that's "surely" not seeing it on the ground. |
| 168002357 | 4个月前 | Not objecting, but this looks like a large-scale edit and I wonder where it was discussed. I didn't see anything on the talk-us-massachusetts mailinglist. Are you local to MA? |
| 144157595 | 5个月前 | please don't delete landuse=conservation. That is actually a valid tag, despite the wiki wrongly claiming deprecation. |
| 169394912 | 5个月前 | |
| 169395419 | 5个月前 | |
| 169394298 | 5个月前 | For clarification: MassGIS publishes town corner coordinates from a professional survey. I have also measured them, with less than professional equipment. So far my judgement is that for my previous measurements, the state's coordinates are more reliable, but my current measurements might be similar. Thus, I have aligned the boundary to the state's coordinates (transformed to ITRF2014). Also, I put the historic boundary stone at my measurement -- which is only 1m away. This is a compromise and shows the uncertainty, and that's what seems useful to me, the active local. Feel free to message me if you are also local and think it should be different, or to bring it up on the MA email list. |
| 134118633 | 5个月前 | I've made the edit. Happy to discuss if you'd like |
| 127260324 | 6个月前 | name dropped, nevermind |
| 134118633 | 6个月前 | In josm, building=retail is appearing as if mistagged, and retail isn't a value in the wiki, despite being mentioned in the text of commercial. Plus, hairdresser is primarily service vs goods, so I would suggest building=commercial. Is that ok with you? |
| 127260324 | 6个月前 | This is a bench with name=Amenity. I didn't see any bench names today. ok to assume that's a mistake in tagging and clean it up? |
| 148164977 | 7个月前 | I see you have deleted your account, so will edit away.... |