Logo de OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Gruppo de modificationes Quando Commento
59365356 16 dies retro

This node is seriously in the wrong place. Was the restaurant really on the corner of Washington and Washington Court in May of 2018?

I have moved it to the actual location based on on-the-ground survey.

157669195 3 menses retro

What "city map"? What is the copyright status/license of it? How can I look at it?

168894908 3 menses retro

According to the MassDOT data set as shown in MassMapper, Meadow Pond is a public road, with a 35' right of way. It may be that the marking is improper, which would not change access. I'll see about contacting Concord, after finishing up with Acton :-)

168851441 3 menses retro

L3 parcels shows Anthem Way and the other 3 as a public right of way. I intend to inquire of the town; it seems that either L3 parcels is wrong or the signs are improper.

167759001 3 menses retro

Can you link to "Meadow Pond"? I can't find it. I will check the signage on Anthem Way next time I go by.

167759001 3 menses retro

OSM has a confused doctrine, visible on the ground out of one side of its mouth, and a strong focus on the English "public rights of way" out of the other. In the US (at least in MA), public rights of way are verifiable at the registry of deeds. So I think access tags should follow what the actual legal situation is. OSM also has a tradition of tagging signs, representing exactly what the sign said, whether or not what is on it is true, and whether the person who put it up is acting properly or not.

The case of Anthem Way is curious, and I'll follow up with the Acton Planning board. It could be that L3 is wrong here, and it's easy enough to request the subdivision plan, special permit, or comprehensive permit as those are all public records.

167759001 3 menses retro

In this case, the Ridgewood and Westview in Stow are shown as carved out from the condo property.

167759001 3 menses retro

Thanks for working on this. I had a note to fix Regency, and am glad you did. To figure out if a road is a "real road", which in MA means either a "public way" or a "private way" (easement for the public to pass, but is not necessarily maintained by the government) or something "not a road" such as a driveway, the best resource is "L3 Parcels" or "Tax Parcels" which shows legal roads as carved out spaces.

164082063 3 menses retro

It looks like you moved a bunch of nodes when you added the wikidata tag. Is that what you think happened, and If so I wonder why?

151517759 3 menses retro

I just noticed this (adding the cell antenna), and "residential" seemed wrong, as L3 Parcels show it not as a legal street. So I have changed it to service. The change to residential was long ago, in a huge changeset, with a gibberish comment, referencing Bing -- which makes no sense.

Can you explain the name? Is there a road name? Is this way used for anything other than water/cell-tower access?

Is there a gate? Surely this is locked and access private but that's "surely" not seeing it on the ground.

168002357 4 menses retro

Not objecting, but this looks like a large-scale edit and I wonder where it was discussed. I didn't see anything on the talk-us-massachusetts mailinglist.

Are you local to MA?

144157595 5 menses retro

please don't delete landuse=conservation. That is actually a valid tag, despite the wiki wrongly claiming deprecation.

169394912 5 menses retro

See changeset/169394298

169395419 5 menses retro

See changeset/169394298

169394298 5 menses retro

For clarification: MassGIS publishes town corner coordinates from a professional survey. I have also measured them, with less than professional equipment. So far my judgement is that for my previous measurements, the state's coordinates are more reliable, but my current measurements might be similar. Thus, I have aligned the boundary to the state's coordinates (transformed to ITRF2014). Also, I put the historic boundary stone at my measurement -- which is only 1m away. This is a compromise and shows the uncertainty, and that's what seems useful to me, the active local. Feel free to message me if you are also local and think it should be different, or to bring it up on the MA email list.

134118633 5 menses retro

I've made the edit. Happy to discuss if you'd like

127260324 6 menses retro

name dropped, nevermind

134118633 6 menses retro

In josm, building=retail is appearing as if mistagged, and retail isn't a value in the wiki, despite being mentioned in the text of commercial. Plus, hairdresser is primarily service vs goods, so I would suggest building=commercial. Is that ok with you?

127260324 6 menses retro

This is a bench with name=Amenity. I didn't see any bench names today. ok to assume that's a mistake in tagging and clean it up?

148164977 7 menses retro

I see you have deleted your account, so will edit away....