gdt's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
134118633 | about 9 hours ago | In josm, building=retail is appearing as if mistagged, and retail isn't a value in the wiki, despite being mentioned in the text of commercial. Plus, hairdresser is primarily service vs goods, so I would suggest building=commercial. Is that ok with you? |
127260324 | 16 days ago | This is a bench with name=Amenity. I didn't see any bench names today. ok to assume that's a mistake in tagging and clean it up? |
148164977 | about 1 month ago | I see you have deleted your account, so will edit away.... |
148164977 | about 1 month ago | Not saying it wasn't there then, but today eastern bank was NOT here, there was construction and signs that Chase was coming soon. also didn't see sweet thyme. |
166510759 | about 1 month ago | I think this should be reverted, and a fixme="probably stream; needs field checking" tag, or some such added. It seems 99% likely that someone was intending to add a stream and made an error. Why do you think it is ok to just delete, rather than comment on the original changeset and ask? The point of OSM is to work together to improve the map database (and the surrounding infrastructure), and just deleting doesn't really fit that. |
155148291 | about 1 month ago | Have you noticed that a way you added, almost certainly a stream, but not tagged, was deleted by another user? |
152437253 | about 2 months ago | Did you see a no trespassing sign, or merely a small "private way" tag above the street name? In Massachusetts, "private ways" have an easement to the public, the same as "public ways". It is merely that maintenance responsibility differs. L3 parcels shows this as subject to a road easement -- which would have been necessary to obtain planning permission. So I think this private tagging is wrong and should be removed. |