Help me understand the motivation - why go against the standard used everywhere else in the world and against all cartographic tradition? What I mean is what is the motivation for adding the name to this specific part of the road (which is already named)? And if the sidewalk is named why not also name all the other parts of the road (crosswalks, etc)?

I am not aware of anywhere else in the world that does it this way. The issue is it has the problem of breaking geocoding and other data consumers because you creates tons of duplicates (which is how I became aware of the situation). It is great that the sidewalks are mapped, but is it not clear that they belong to the road? No other bits of road infrastrucutre also has the name (crossings, etc).

Hi, do you mind briefly explaining the logic to me? I am not Catalan, but lived on that street for 5 years (and did most of the mapping in this neighbourhood back then). The sidewalks don't have names, the street has a name. Also, someone added all the address points, which I understand the logic of. The problem is in many cases one large building spans multiple address points, and only one address is actually used. The unused address points lead to bad geocoding.

I have made the change. Thanks for making my aware

hmm, yes, possibly it should be boundary=region

probably the tags / values
"claimed_by=US;MH"
and "controlled_by=US"
should be added to way/42294763
which is boundary=administrative and has an admin_level=2

you are correct, thanks

sorry, I should clarify, yes, it is great that the state is back, but we need the municipalities as well if possible. And the state now has a new osm id, which causes unnecessary pain for downstream data consumers. Only one of the five municipalities is back. In my opinion the best option would be to totally reverse this changeset (if that is still possible - probably not due to other changes in the meanwhile)

Hi Doug,

don't worry, everyone makes mistakes, the key is learning from them and repairing any issues. I'm not sure your revert worked though, relation
2551642 still is shown as deleted as are the municipalities. I hate to press, but I have projects that depend on this data and it's now been 6 days. Please can you just reverse the entire changeset and then at your leisure make the changes you need without deleting the state and the municipalities.

thanks for your help

Please can you instead roll back this change ASAP so we get the state back and then you can fine tune things at your leisure. Losing a whole state for many days is bad

This edit also took out 5 different Mexican municipalities (admin_level 6). Please can we revert this change? It doesn't seem you accomplished what you intended.