Service is valid for either preference, and the general consensus on OSM is the higher option, which only lists service. I've already changed them back.

Done in changeset/182231365

I was looking at the imagery used in the changeset, the perfect circles might be right, but the positioning definitely seems off, as well as that crossover section that I would have thought should be merged into one.

Hi, was the removal of boundary=administrative from relation/216359 intentional?

Same concerns as your other changeset around landuse=grass and the fences. Can you also explain changing Hein Road to residential, given the lack of houses on that road?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182185316

Hi, is way/1508709183 actually grass, or is it potentially just farmland that was captured by imagery with no visible growth? based on the track marks, I'd say the latter is more likely. I also doubt some of the fence lines you've drawn, as these are all in the middle of where visible tracks are from farm equipment.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182185856

Hi, you've got two landuses that are overlapping, and some of these look like they're just generated circles that haven't been adjusted to the actual landuse.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182185938

Hi, you've accidentally set the maxspeed:conditional to 0 on these, I'm assuming these should be 40?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182205603

@ljc_jlyb, this was a documented automated edit, a large boundary box is expected and the change itself would have to be well documented to explain what happens.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182051765

Hi, what's the justification for moving these to residential? These are just u-turn spots, I would have thought service would be more appropriate?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181978982

@iandees, this edit was done by a bot that just changed it from http:// to https://
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181953188

Hi, oneway=no is default in most cases.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181886192

Hi, please be more descriptive than just "update" for your changeset comments.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181892171

From aerial imagery, I think this (and the road it connects to) might be better off as service (and potentially driveway if it's a single property) instead of residential. Probably best to confirm with street level imagery though.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181664605

Hi, this is marked as barrier=gate and with nothing indicating it is a path.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181554622

Hi, if they're informal and/or private, they should still be mapped but marked as such.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181441652

Hi, can you please be more descriptive in your changeset comments, you actually haven't changed anything to do with runways here, just surrounding buildings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181382484

addr:* tags aren't needed on roads, they're for buildings and facilities. I'd remove them from these two roads.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181346450

Sorry, fast food not petrol station.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181286240

The service ways at the petrol station have been drawn incorrectly, there shouldn't be two separate ways for a single piece of undivided roadway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181286240