If there's no name on it, then there should be no name tag in OSM.

Anything under 6 months, the most I would consider doing is a conditional tag, and even then, the rail still exists and it's not in a permanent state of disuse, so the change to disused isn't really accurate even over that temporary period.

Hi, what is the source for the name, is this visible on the side of the building at all?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182324069

Revert mapping of path that doesn't exist

changeset/182361056

Yeah, this seems like an iD "fix" that might not actually be correct. Please make sure that suggestions from ID are correct before accepting them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182338531

Service is valid for either preference, and the general consensus on OSM is the higher option, which only lists service. I've already changed them back.

Done in changeset/182231365

I was looking at the imagery used in the changeset, the perfect circles might be right, but the positioning definitely seems off, as well as that crossover section that I would have thought should be merged into one.

Hi, was the removal of boundary=administrative from relation/216359 intentional?

Same concerns as your other changeset around landuse=grass and the fences. Can you also explain changing Hein Road to residential, given the lack of houses on that road?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182185316

Hi, is way/1508709183 actually grass, or is it potentially just farmland that was captured by imagery with no visible growth? based on the track marks, I'd say the latter is more likely. I also doubt some of the fence lines you've drawn, as these are all in the middle of where visible tracks are from farm equipment.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182185856

Hi, you've got two landuses that are overlapping, and some of these look like they're just generated circles that haven't been adjusted to the actual landuse.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182185938

Hi, you've accidentally set the maxspeed:conditional to 0 on these, I'm assuming these should be 40?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182205603

@ljc_jlyb, this was a documented automated edit, a large boundary box is expected and the change itself would have to be well documented to explain what happens.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182051765

Hi, what's the justification for moving these to residential? These are just u-turn spots, I would have thought service would be more appropriate?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181978982

@iandees, this edit was done by a bot that just changed it from http:// to https://
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181953188

Hi, oneway=no is default in most cases.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181886192

Hi, please be more descriptive than just "update" for your changeset comments.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181892171

From aerial imagery, I think this (and the road it connects to) might be better off as service (and potentially driveway if it's a single property) instead of residential. Probably best to confirm with street level imagery though.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181664605

Hi, this is marked as barrier=gate and with nothing indicating it is a path.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181554622