OpenStreetMap
fortera_au's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 184719047 | Hi, if this is meant to represent the top level, there's a few issues with it. If it's for a lower level, then it might be worth indicating that. There's also no connection to other roads, so it's an isolated island at the moment.
|
|
| 183908589 | If you want to just specify which units are in one whole building, you'd just put the range (I.e. 1-3) in the unit part. Otherwise, one option would just to put nodes where each unit is and just put the address in for each one, with no other details. |
|
| 183908589 | Hi, if those are buildings, you've removed that from being marked. Landuse would be for the surrounding area, not for the individual buildings. You'd want to tag those as building=apartments.
|
|
| 183917890 | Hi, the roadway should still follow the main part of the road, the turning circle being mapped is enough to indicate it's presence
|
|
| 183919990 | Hi, it's not a definite rule, but in most cases, lanes are usually going to be highway=service and often service=alley.
|
|
| 183851464 | Hi, for private you want access=private. access=no would mean nobody can access it at all.
|
|
| 183885828 | Hi, I believe the one way here might be temporary, from memory the intention is for this section to be two way, just only connecting to the northbound side of the road. Can you check with your colleague on that?
|
|
| 183511213 | Hi, you've drawn a sidewalk over the top of the road, this is probably incorrect. The other ones don't match up to aerial imagery too.
|
|
| 183518853 | Hi, if this is a driveway, should the maxspeed still be 50 and the name remain?
|
|
| 183351854 | Hi, is there a reason for this to be a relation? Those relations are generally used for things like M/A/B/C routes, not just for a single road. |
|
| 183391926 | Hi, what government website was your source? Just because it's a government website, it doesn't mean we automatically have the right to use it. |
|
| 183417605 | Hi, if that is a driveway, it should probably be changed to highway=service and service=driveway.
|
|
| 183470535 | Hi aerial imagery still shows a dog-leg at the intersection, has this been removed recently?
|
|
| 183327243 | When you say this doesn't officially exist, is there some kind of spot here where you can stop still? If so, then it should probably remain mapped in some form. Removing the parking is fair, the rest_stop there's arguments either way in that it's not officially one, but it's somewhat become one. The highway should remain, maybe as a short highway=track if anything, but there is something there that exists (according to aerial imagery at least).
|
|
| 183274269 | Adding smaller segments of wood like you have here is incorrect. You shouldn't map for a specific editor, just like you shouldn't map for a specific router/renderer. If you need to make a large boundary easier to work with in other editors, I'd recommend splitting the large way into multiple segments and then using them to make a multipolgyon. This changeset should be reverted, along with any other similar edits.
|
|
| 183210854 | Thanks for the explanation. If you do think you can determine it from aerial imagery then that's fine, I mostly just wanted to see if there was a way it was determined or if it was just picked from a preset. |
|
| 183146660 | Somehow OSMCha had an invisible horizontal scroll that perfectly cut off the word Chicken, my apologies! |
|
| 183146660 | Hi, was removing Chicken from the name intentional? Their website still includes it. Also, postcode and suburb aren't necessary in AU.
|
|
| 183198985 | Hi, what is the source for this? I can't find anything about Schoenthal in SA other than a winery?
|
|
| 183199815 | Hi, what's the source for this new suburb? I can't find anything indicating it exists
|