Hi Andy,

This changeset includes 'Prest House NT' at node/2470053447

The National Trust website has this as 'The Priest's House' and I was considering changing it. Wasn't sure if Prest House was a typo, or possibly an alternative name. Do you recall from 7 years ago?

Cheers,

eteb3

Hi, there is a barrier=boom at node/1494109581

Is this a barrier=lift_gate , a 'lifting boom'? (barrier=lift_gate)

If so could I change the tag because barrier=boom is also used for a floating boom on a waterway: eg, way/363050752

Hi
Wondered if you recall the source of the ncn_ref=63 tag on Bluebell Bridge. (It shows up blue on the cycle layer with my note on it: changeset/16438666)
It's something of an outlier as it's unconnected with any other NCN. I haven't ground surveyed and could if that's going to decide it. Also I guess the question may be nugatory given that Sustrans have decommissioned ncn63 Peterborough to Stamford.
Thoughts welcome! Thanks. Eteb3

Hola Pablo. Gracias por haber añadido este viario. b_d_r ha hecho una pregunta sobre acceso por la carretera aquí https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=67812

Sabes cuando es descubierto y posible utilizarlo? Hay una manera saberlo por referencia a una regla o calendario, p. ej., lo cual podría codificarse en los atributos? O tal vez es totalmente impredecible?

Gracias por tu ayuda: es un caso interesante!

How's this Natasha?
changeset/76056105

Oh hang on, well spotted: that node seems to be blocking Western Avenue as well as the turn into Acacia Avenue: that's definitely not the case.

I think this was an iD thing: it must have snapped the node that I intended to block Acacia Ave only onto the junction.

To be clear: there is now, following the redevelopment, no turn into Acacia Ave from Western Ave from either direction.

I'll have a look at how that should be mapped, but if you get this in the mean time and would like to give me some pointers, please do.

Hello, that was a survey: there is a new health centre and a new housing development (also marked), and as part of that redevelopment they have put a bike-permeable barrier at this junction (around August if I recall correctly). My guess is that your data is a little old - that or the local rude-boys have flattened the bollards!

Hi again jpennycook,

I added access=yes to the gate at the Woodcroft crossing, and only then thought to check back through the history. It appears you added had access=yes before, then in a later change you had removed it. Was that accidental or was there a survey reason? I haven't been through that way since I think last summer (could have been this summer!) and maybe things have changed.

Or, maybe as it's a request crossing, and slow, it makes sense to show it as access=no.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

eteb3

Hi Risteárd,

I was looking at values of denomination= and see you switched sunni to Sufi here. Could I ask why? From the website I'd guess the vast majority of the congregation would want to call themselves sunnis.

To be fair I think the tag is unhelpful: 'sufi' sticks out like a sore thumb in the list of 'denominations':
denomination=*#Islamic_denominations
Sufism is about inward spirituality whereas all the others are about intellectual creed.

Would value your thoughts.

eteb3

Hi Andy

Thanks for improving the map.

Could I check: is the vicarage used for actual services, or is it the residence of the vicar (or perhaps something else)?

eteb3

Hi Phillip,
I'm surveying Sutton (Peterborough) at the moment in dribs and drabs.

I've put a note where your possible pipeline crosses a road junction:
note/1908408

Are there things to look out for on the ground if I'm to confirm that your water pipeline runs that way?
Thanks

Ah yes, I see that's in the window. I think that's an advert for their wares, rather than a name. FHRS has yet another name. (And they're trying to sell the lease so may change again soon...)

Thanks for scraping up lots of my nameless POIs in this changeset.

Re 'Fresh Nata', is this from an eyeball survey? That one I intentionally left without a name as there's nothing above the door (that I could see).

Makes sense, I see what you mean. I'd assumed centre-of-channel in line with default land ownership rules. Will have a go this weekend - but if I forget feel free!

Thanks. I added Holme Dunes Observatory (NOA reserve) the other day, and only realised after that I've drawn it overlapping with Holme Dunes reserve (NWT).

I based that on my memories of a visit >6 months ago, and the description on their website of the extent of their property

Minded to leave them overlapping while both reserves need better boundaries. Thoughts welcome on . my changeset changeset/75350973

Is the fix me still valid at Holme Dunes NWT reserve, or has that been fixed by your survey? (Nice work, btw)

Thanks for labelling the bridge.

It seems to get called Milton Ferry Bridge locally (rather than just Ferry Br)

eg, MFB is the name on Nene Park maps - or does it go by two names?

I assume DaveF had this in mind:
fhrs:rating=*?uselang=en-GB

Hi Richard

It also appears that those buildings don't have a building=yes tag (I think that's why they're not showing on Mapnik render?)

Regards,

Edward

Thanks for all that feedback; very useful.
On opening times, it looks from the link you sent that it would be impossible to adhere to the syntax and also capture the sun-variable opening times - do you think? The mosque is open at dawn prayers, but that can be anything from around 0345 to 0745 depending on the time of year; and final close at evening is similarly variable. I'll remove the opening times for the time being - but these are often very important to a practising Muslim when travelling to a mosque to pray - it might not be worth the journey if it's locked. (Maybe we can have sun-variable time tags?)
I hadn't realised I'd deleted the Bing tag - I assumed that was the source just for the change I was making at that point. I'll put that back (and will have to do so for just about every change I've made in the last 2 weeks! Can I find a list of these somewhere?!)
I've found the same as you re mosque names; also that their names slowly mutate through the years, and at any one time aren't even always consistent from one piece of literature to another. On their website this mosque calls itself FeM *Mosque* - that seems to have been a relatively recent change, I think.
I can transcribe Arabic, but these folk don't use it: in fact there's no sign outside at all. Salah ad-Din Mosque at the bottom of Cromwell Rd does, I think, so once I've checked that that is the case I'll add.
Thank you for your review - very helpful indeed. There are plenty of other changes I've been making elsewhere, and I hope not disastrously. Should possibly slow down and let others tutor me...