Has the bridge construction been completed? The Strava heat map shows activiity but that could just mean that the bridge was open to pedestrian/bike traffic during construction

There's a note concerning the name of a waterway added in this changeset. I've pasted the text of the note below, seems to me that the note author is correct that the name is incorrect but wanted to check first.

"Here, the stream labeled "North Fork Republican River" flows into the Arikaree River, which then flows northeast into the real named "North Fork Republican River." This seems hydrologically implausible, but I don't have a source to confirm the actual name, whether this is a mislabeling or a special case. Leaving this note for review by local experts or those with access to better maps."

note/4897951#map=16/40.01707/-102.00096&layers=N

updated

The speed limit on this and some nearby road segments was changed to 4535 mph. I believe it used to be 45, perhaps it was meant to be changed to 35. Here's a link to the note that was recently left concerning the speed limit. note/4969023

Happy to help out, I noticed a couple other paths nearby that I added to the map. They looked like user generated trails/social trails so I added them as informal paths. If these are official trails, they could be changed from informal path to foot path. If you are a Strava subscriber you have access to the heat map which is helpful for finding unmapped trails.

A note was left today concerning Bear Creek Park and Golf course being mapped as a reservoir/basin. Is there a reason for the way this is currently mapped? Link to note: note/4913787

You added a height of 1000 meters for a communication tower about a year ago. Was this supposed to be 1000 feet? osm.org/edit?note=4901568#map=21/41.8177940/-87.9892294

Thanks so much for the quick response and updates!

Full text of note:
Is way/123622065/history still under costruction? Then it should be highway=construction if blocked or have construction=minor tag if pasable. If it is no longer under construction, then construction tag should be removed

A note was left inquiring if this section of road was still under construction and there were concerns whether the correct construction tags were being used. Link to note: note/4895095#map=15/30.41884/-84.34970

There are some strange looking land use polygons in developed residential and commercial areas that do not follow the straight lines that define these areas on the ground. Lines contain irregular curves that don't correspond to reality and due to the vast excess of points used to define the shapes it is difficult to fix these shapes. Would it be ok to just delete these irregular shapes and just start over? Here's an example that I partially fixed: way/886549722/history#map=17/41.813063/-71.369576&layers=N

Weird typing issue in rapid editor. Meant to write "add butcher" as the changeset comment

There's a note claiming that the Paul Murray Wildlife Area doesn't exist. There's little info about this area, what is the source for the name of this area?

added community center

A note appeared today concerning the name of this pond. What was the source of the name?

Changed surface to concrete. Thanks for the information!