Hey TheNet1996,

Why did you add restriction relations to a barrier feature? This seems redundant, as providing access tags should already cause routers not to route through the barrier feature for relevant modes of transport.

Regards,

Daniel

"Hello, there is gate and access=no for bike and hikers. Is it right? Routing is impossible here. Thanks"

Ref note/3153248

Editors and PDOK have 7.5cm imagery available since last year. You can also use Esri's 'enhanced' imagery (essentially the same imagery with some filters applied) which should be available in most places, though on some zoom levels may show older imagery (so be careful).

cc: vladaboitsik; Mapbox
https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/366#issuecomment-1109635771

Hey Heliotrope,

Try to continue using good changeset comments, please.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Renas Azad,

Use good changeset comments, please.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Marc0Aureli0,

This changeset has been reverted in
changeset/120204328

Do not create empty nodes, please. This does not belong in OpenStreetMap.
iD should prevent you from doing so.

Could you explain what you intended to do?

Regards,

Daniel

Hey fnzilani,

Use good changeset comments, please.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Regards,

Daniel

Hey moses moturi,

Use good changeset comments, please.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Regards,

Daniel

Hey santosbike,

Use good changeset comments, please.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Regards,

Daniel

Hey tiongiedca,

Use good changeset comments, please.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Regards,

Daniel

See for more information
osm.wiki/Names
(Name is the name only, Names are not for descriptions)

Hey Paul,

Could you provide proper sources for your changesets, please? Your name is not a source.

Also, refering to yourself in changeset comments is redundant, all contributions can already be traced back to your account.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Lisawie,

Congratulations on changeset/120120120 and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Have fun mapping and travelling! :-)

Regards,

Daniel

Reverted changesets: 120170622 120170533 120170432 120170256 120170062 120169901 120169688 15172478

Changeset comments: 120170622 15172478

Hey there,

I have reverted your changes in
changeset/120180562
as there are unverifiable (non-physical, no source specified).

Specify a source for your changes from which can be concluded these are physical objects, please.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey there,

I have reverted your changes in
changeset/120180562
as there are unverifiable (non-physical, no source specified).

Specify a source for your changes from which can be concluded these are physical objects, please.

Regards,

Daniel

Ok, mais il y a aussi
changeset/116450840
Les changements sont ok? Je pense non.

Ref note/3013686
pour fermer..

Thanks bxl. And, added a bench. :-)

changeset/119810161

(*and the part of the footway inside the building would be removed.)

If you are nearby, please check whether the footway goes under a roof, or into a building. "layer=-1" usually means something is underground - if it's a roof, an area building:part=roof + layer=1 should do. if it goes into the building, the footway should be split up and entrances should be added.

Regards,

Daniel