If you click on the area you can see its tags in the left sidebar/tab.

Ways/lines shouldn't be connected to Landuse/natural/areas, as there's no reason for them to be.

You can right click on each of the nodes in the editor and click the 'disconnect' option (arrows pointing away from each other.

Once they are disconnected you can choose to move the node around or delete it if there's no bend in the way there. Note, this may move either of the two new nodes. Selecting the way/line first and then moving the node may help.

Alternatively, you can leave the two new nodes on top of each other. This will prompt a "close nodes" warning in the editor. You don't have to worry too much about warnings yet, however.

The "c" in "carretera" should be.

Hallo openoptimix und wilkomme,

Die bollard sieht gut aus glaube ich.

Happy mapping!

GrüB,

Daniel

Hey notnebtp,

This bridge looks a bit too big. I'm sure it doesn't cover the full road.

Go to the segments which aren't bridge. Click on them (one at a time), view the left sidebar/tab and scroll down to the Tags section. Here, remove the bridge=yes and layer=1 tags.
Save your edit and wait. Now you'll have a bridge of the correct size, hopefully.

Learn more on OSM here:
http://learnosm.org/

Regards,

Daniel

*Correction specifically on fyi: this is regarding way/972109383

Regarding way/972109383

For "name", use the signposted name, if any, including proper capitalization.

Regarding way/972109008

For "name", use the signposted name, if any, including proper capitalization.

Hey marc and welcome,

Regarding way/972106341

Looks like you connected the way with the landuse. You usually shouldn't do this.
node/8997142334/history

node/8997142335/history

node/8997142343/history

node/8997142358/history

Just fyi, you can simply continue the existing track if it only has tags which also apply to this segment.

Happy mapping!

Regards,

Daniel

Bonjour Hernie,

Avec iD c'est facile bouger les nodes incorrectement.
Regardez, s'il vous plait.

-

This edit moves an interpolation address node incorrectly. It does not add any data on "Clinique Hernie Discale .com", nor would this data belong on this node.
The edit may have been saved by accident. Otherwise, it may be considered as vandalism.

Hallo und wilkomme STpheohm,

Vielleicht ist es besser mit "playground=water" oder "playground=splash_pad" -ohne beschreibung-. Sehe
playground=*

Hey and welcome K_Feickert,

Note, other imagery layers may be better in this area (i.e. Maxar, National Agriculture Imagery Program).

If toilet(s) is/are located in dedicated building, tag it building=toilets

See also amenity=toilets

You can find most tags on the wiki.
osm.wiki/wiki/

Just fyi, you can always mark a changeset for review when saving it in the editor.

Regards,

Daniel

Beste Weshuis,

Welkom (terug) in Nederland,

Wie of wat is/zijn Annabelle & Koen?
Gaat het om een bedrijf? We taggen POIs op nodes, niet op vlakken. Zet het dan op de adresnode.
Kijk op de wiki voor de juiste tags:
osm.wiki/Map_features

Gaat het om een persoon? Dan voegen we het niet toe. Haal het dan van het gebouw af.

Kijk je nog even?

Groet,

Daniel

-

Dear Weshuis,

Welcome (back) to the Netherlands,

Who or what is/are Annabelle & Koen?
Is it about a company? We tag POIs on nodes, not on areas. You should add it on the address node instead.
Check the wiki for the proper tags:
osm.wiki/Map_features

Is it about a person? Then we don't add it. You should remove it from the building.

Please take a look.

Beste Tauvic,

De juiste tag voor bankjes is amenity=bench
amenity=bench

De meeste tags kan je vinden op de wiki.
osm.wiki/wiki/

Daarnaast zou de changeset comment "residentie" beter kunnen. Bijvoorbeeld hier "added bench" of "bankje toegevoegd". Wel zit je wellicht vast aan één comment per sessie met de app, dat kan. Zeg dan bv. "survey 2021-08-10". Dit kan je ook gebruiken om je "source" (bron) wat duidelijker te maken.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
(zoals eerder verwezen door eggie)

*source:PDOK aerial imagery Beeldmateriaal.nl 25cm latest;Mapillary

tweaked landuse.*

tweaked landuse.*

Hey viplavm,

In Nordrhein Westfalen, NRW Orthophoto is the standard imagery layer. If it doesn't work, look for a wm(t)s link to put in the "Custom" layer in iD (see also the German forum).

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Diana,

Note, the standard imagery in The Netherlands is PDOK aerial imagery Beeldmateriaal.nl 25cm latest. This layer has recently had downtime, but should be working again. If it is not working for you, use this link in the "Custom" layer in iD:

https://service.pdok.nl/hwh/luchtfotorgb/wmts/v1_0?FORMAT=image/jpeg&SERVICE=WMTS&REQUEST=GetTile&VERSION=1.0.0&LAYER=Actueel_ortho25&STYLE=&FORMAT=image/jpeg&tileMatrixSet=OGC:1.0:GoogleMapsCompatible&tileMatrix={zoom}&tileRow={y}&tileCol={x}

Hey Vika,

Note, the standard imagery in The Netherlands is PDOK aerial imagery Beeldmateriaal.nl 25cm latest. This layer has recently had downtime, but should be working again. If it is not working for you, use this link in the "Custom" layer in iD:

https://service.pdok.nl/hwh/luchtfotorgb/wmts/v1_0?FORMAT=image/jpeg&SERVICE=WMTS&REQUEST=GetTile&VERSION=1.0.0&LAYER=Actueel_ortho25&STYLE=&FORMAT=image/jpeg&tileMatrixSet=OGC:1.0:GoogleMapsCompatible&tileMatrix={zoom}&tileRow={y}&tileCol={x}

Ik had moeten verwijzen naar deze pagina:
osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Elk begin is moeilijk. We kunnen niet bij elke changeset een review geven (en vgm zit er in OsmAnd niet zoals in iD een knop om een changeset voor review te markeren.)
Er zijn regels bij OpenStreetMap, daar moeten we ons aan houden. De naam is dan ook echt alleen voor de naam, niet een beschrijving.
Aparte tags zijn overigens veel makkelijker om mee te werken voor iedereen (mensen die bijwerken en mensen die de data gebruiken).

Veel plezier met karteren!