OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
184788701

Hey Elmerot,

Are you sure The Black Cat Cafe is no longer there?
It is on the top floor of the building.
This was signed on the ground floor entrance as well.
The cafe is closed on mondays..
It might also be temporarily closed for summer holidays.

Is there a sign or other explicit markings indicating it is permanently closed?
If it is permanently closed, is anything else (another bussiness) there now, or is it empty space?

Regards,

Daniel

184785193

also there is tactile paving on the west/left side but it is rather small and partially below the bollard row :/
(I changed them to 'yes' anyways)

184785193

Added back crossing with service way for now
changeset/184786272
(was concerned with the two footway-footway 'crossings')

changeset/184787448
Keep traffic lights and kerbs separate, if you want to map the pedestrian traffic lights at all.
There is not a kerb in the middle of the footway-footway junction.
(nor is the traffic light preferably but let's ignore them for now)

184736806

If you put it in front of AIB north of signalled crossing it will go around as you said.

However, if you put it instead on footway south of Caffe 500 it will route over crossing on Ormonde Street.

In left sidebar, scroll down to Alternative routes
Set number of routes to 3
Set share factor to maximum
(It shares most of its length with the route you mentioned)
Keep weight factor at >1
(It is 'longer' somehow, perhaps spending more time at unmarked crossing or in side-street)

Now it will be shown as alternative route.

Maybe it prefers routing along main street (penalizes side-street) / prefers signalled crossings vs marked ones, ignores this crossing which is now too far along path /...

Regardless, adding non-existing crossings or other to increase 'accessibility' of route would be mapping for the router.

Reverted this changeset fully in
changeset/184784765

Regards,

Daniel

183641568

Thank you for taking time to look at issue nr. 2. First issue could use your feedback. Also I have since opened multiple other issues, some bugs and some feature requests.

Happy mapping :-)

184736806

This looks incorrect. Could you take a look at this, please?

Neither are road/multi-use crossings on Panoramax 2025. Perhaps you were thinking of service way to the north.
node/11236658811/history

Did they change the kerb at Patrick's Court from raised to lowered/flush to allow ie. bicycles? I assume they have not, as there is pedestrian crossing nearby.

Made this more explicit in
https://osmcha.org/changesets/184743239
(adding in-editor note here prevents it from being mapped incorrectly again in the future. I won't do this on ie. connection to building entrance of course.)

The other is T-junction between pedestrian road crossing and sidewalk. Footway continuing west/left goes to likely private steps.

As such, I would suggest reverting this changeset.

184517186

Hey eliasp,

POIs with names like ... Praxis fur ... seems like descriptive name.
osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

see also
osm.wiki/Good_practice

Good to see you already know about healthcare tags. If you are unsure how to tag something, add a note or fixme tag and discuss with the local community (I assume you already do this though)

If you really have to, then use the description tag for more information, but be aware tags are limited to like 256 characters, so it may not fit and cause you to lose (existing) details.

Regards,

Daniel

184667091

Looks better. Modified it further in
changeset/184668867

184663724

way/1302022175

I think it is access=private or even access=no, I don't think anyone goes there except maybe to clean the ditch so it looks less bleak? :'-)

184655612

Hey Anne,

This outdoor seating location does not look accurate. Could you take a look, please?

note/5362770

Regards,

Daniel

183881102

Hey bongomebong,

This is a duplicate of the existing Giant's Grave at
way/1531994955

Make sure to be properly zoomed in when making edits. (Also, make sure the application your using displays existing objects); OsmAnd should be able to show such objects afaik.

I have added it as alternative name for now -which makes it searchable- though perhaps The Labby Rock is its main name, or local name, and Giant's Grave / Carrickglas Dolmen is used infrequently these days, but it can be changed later.

Merged in
changeset/184534077

You can see changes visually at
https://osmcha.org/changesets/184534077

Regards,

Daniel

183641568

PS: Es izveidoju problēmas ziņojumu GitHub repozitorijā, kas veltīts piena kannu statīvu kartēm. Vai varētu to, lūdzu, apskatīt? /
I opened an issue on the milk churn stand map GitHub repository. Could you take a look, please?

https://github.com/APizich/piena-galdi/issues/1

183641568

Angļu valodas teksts zemāk / English below

Sveiki, Vizma un Artūrs,

Esmu pievienojis aprakstu angļu valodā ar dažām detaļām.
Tāpat esmu mainījis materiālu no betona uz koksni. Platforma ir no koka, bet zem tās esošā caurule ir no betona.
osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Lai gan esmu pārliecināts, ka to pievienot prezentācijas laikā konferencē „SotM Baltics 2026“ būs diezgan satraucoši.

Izmaiņas veiktas
changeset/184520715

Izmaiņas var redzēt vizuāli šeit:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/184520715

Ar cieņu,

Daniel

---

Hey Vizma and Artūrs,

Added english description with some details.
Also changed the material from concrete to wood. The platform is wood, the culvert below it is concrete.
osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

though I am sure it is nerves of adding this while presenting at SotM Baltics 2026.

Modified in
changeset/184520715

You can see changes visually at
https://osmcha.org/changesets/184520715

Regards,

Daniel

165865525

The remaining not:natural=wood are large multi-crown standalone trees which are easily mistaken for a forest/wood / multiple trees if solely based of aerial imagery. I'll personally keep them for now, though they exist in many places. However, feel free to remove them but with risk that armchair mappers will just add more trees where there are none.

159636756

The only noteable thing here is they support showing cars actually driving on the left since about a month
https://core.f4map.com/changelog
(the above may not contain all changes)

A derived list of supported tags is at
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/projects/f4

It does not seem relevant to this changeset though ;-)

165865525

Removed; newer imagery is available.
changeset/184274024

148967498

Merged it with the building in
changeset/184273398

156270498

Modified and updated with new ways
changeset/184269217

See changes visually at
- https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=184269217 ; or
- https://osmcha.org/changesets/184269217

141942125

If the name -be it english, gaelic, etc.- is no lnoger in common use, it is not used by OSM, except some old_name (or name:[year]) though this is better suited for OpeHistoricalMap.

It'd be better to consult the forums in any case.

141942125

It might be useful to read
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/transliterations-of-names-to-other-scripts-than-latin/144050
and join or create a discussion there
as I personally can not provide any further ideas on how to best use name:* in practice.