Howdy, and welcome to openstreetmap. Thank you for your interest in adding to the map. Just so you know, all streets, sidewalks, alleys, etcetera, are assumed to be uncovered. The only time we would need to use the tag, "covered" is when a path or road goes through a building or under an awning, etcetera. Tagging something as covered=no, really has no meaning, as in this case. Thanks :) covered=*?uselang=en-US

Hi, this also has the wrong street name as in the previous changesets :)

Howdy again. In this changeset the same issues need to be corrected from my last comment, address and phone numbers. Thanks :)

Howdy :) Thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset you changed the street name address to "North Washington". The street is actually just named, "Washington". Also, the telephone formats you used here are not correct. Could you go back and correct these issues? Thanks :) phone=*

Hello, it looks like in Asuncion you have created a large number of untagged lines. Can you go back and correct this? Thank you :)

Howdy, and welcome to openstreetmap :) Are you certain about changing the access of this parking lot to "private"? Private would mean it's not accessible to the general public, such as employee only parking or permit only parking. Thanks :) access=private?uselang=en-US

Howdy, again. This changeset has the same issues as with the last changeset where I left a comment for you. Minimum requirements for addresses are 1) street number and 2) street name. Could you go back and correct these buildings? Thanks :)

Howdy, thank you for your additions to openstreetmap. It looks like you've added quite a few houses with "names" that are numbers. I'd suspect these are actually the address numbers of the buildings. The numbers should be part of the street address. Minimum requirements for addresses are 1) street number and 2) street name. Could you go back and correct this? Thanks :)

Okay

In regards to this changeset specifically, you are referring to landuse=basin?

Howdy, rsavoye, just out of curiosity, are you importing buildings?

Hello, is there a reason for changing the network and operator tags for these relations?

Howdy :) Thanks for your work here. Good job! Just a tip for future reference, if another mapper comes along after you and sees this area as "unmapped" because everything has been removed, they might be tempted to add details. It's best to add a construction zone so other mappers will know everything has been torn down. I've gone ahead and done that. Thanks again :)

The edits in this changeset have been reverted to their original condition.

Also in this changeset the format of the phone number added to the Holiday Inn is not correct. Can you go back and change this? You can find the correct format in the link below. Thank you :) phone=*

Hello and thank you again for your interest in OSM. In this changeset it looks like you have accidentally dragged a sidewalk into the street. Sometimes this happens when you use the cursor to move the map around and something is inadvertently moved by mistake. Will you please return to this error and correct it? Thank you very much :) osm.org/edit?way=412452229#map=20/39.54979/-104.76965

Hello, and welcome to openstreetmap. Thank you for your interest in adding to the map. In this changeset you deleted a building and then created a new building in its place. In openstreetmap that's not how we edit buildings. We need to keep the history of the work being done. So, if you need to add something or make something better, that's great, but we don't delete work and replace it with our own work. Below is a link to OSM's "Good practice" page. It has a lot of valuable information. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Good luck with your mapping :) osm.wiki/Good_practice

It looks like you already corrected it. Good job! Thanks :)

Hello, again. I'm curious why, network= Regional Transportation District (RTD) and
operator=Regional Transportation District (RTD) were changed to network=RTD and
operator=Regional Transportation District. Is there documentation I can refer to in order to see why this should be changed? Thank you :)

Hello, I'm curious why this was tagged as layer -1? way/453027244
The wiki says, "the building and the way should have shared nodes at the entry and exit points of the building.
the way is split at the entry and exit nodes and only the part covered by the building is tagged with tunnel=building_passage.
the layer should be the same as the layer of the building, with the above mentioned exception when several tunnels are passing on different levels. So if the building doesn't have a layer tag, the way should not have one either."
Thank you :)