chachafish's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 82794055 | over 5 years ago | Howdy :) Welcome to OSM and thank you for your additions to the map. Just so you know, when we place "state" in the address fields, it is a two-letter identifier. In this case; CO. Could you go back and change this in your edit? Thanks and if you have any questions, feel free to ask :) |
| 82588766 | over 5 years ago | Hmmm, well, okay. Star Trek is fiction, science fiction to be exact. The alien characters (Vulcans, Bajorans, Romulans, Andorians, etc) are all fictional. All of the starships are fictional. The United Federation of Planets is fictional. The alien cultures are fictional. But, apparently it's not fair to refer to a language wholly created within this fictional universe as a fictional language. Got it. Thanks :) |
| 82588766 | over 5 years ago | In my opinion, and using common sense, adding fictional data based on a fictional language that is the lingua franca of a fictional race of people from a fictional planet is not a good practice. |
| 82585928 | over 5 years ago | Hello, thank you for your additions to openstreetmap. Just a couple of things, when you add address information to a building, the minimum requirements are street name and street address. Also, when you make edits, please make your edits in one location and save them before moving on to another country. This will keep your changeset boundaries much smaller. In this changeset you made an edit in the U.K. and in the United States, so your changeset boundary is far too large. Good luck with your mapping. Thank you :) |
| 82588766 | over 5 years ago | Hello. There are a number fictional languages such as the Na'vi (Avatar), Barsoomian (John Carter), Dothraki (Game of Thrones), etc. As these are fictional languages developed from works of science fiction/fantasy, they have no place in OSM. Will you please remove the fictional names you've added? Thank you. |
| 73395360 | almost 6 years ago | Thank you! Much appreciated :) |
| 73089179 | almost 6 years ago | Awesome! Thank you! :) |
| 73395704 | almost 6 years ago | Thank you! :) |
| 81961587 | almost 6 years ago | Okay, thanks! |
| 81961587 | almost 6 years ago | Howdy, thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset it looks like you deleted the wikipedia tag. Did you mean to do this or was it by mistake? Thank you :) |
| 81242291 | almost 6 years ago | Okay, thanks. Yeah, it will need to be reverted in order to retrieve the leisure=golf_course areas and so that we can maintain the changeset histories. I appreciate the work you're doing, however. Just FYI, some of the edits you've created don't quite comply with the OSM wiki pages concerning golf courses. For example, holes don't normally have names. Take a look here: golf=hole Also, "Littleton - Hole 2 - Rough" wouldn't be a name. Littleton wouldn't be used in any event since the parts of the golf course will all exist within the confines of the leisure=golf_course area. "Rough" wouldn't be stated either since this is a description, not a name. "Hole 2" would not be a name, but a ref. The ref would simply be "2". I believe a good example of a correctly mapped golf course is in the link below - if you want to take a look. Have fun with the mapping :) osm.org/#map=17/39.78759/-105.04851 |
| 81242291 | almost 6 years ago | Howdy. Welcome to OSM and thank you for your additions to openstreetmap. In this changeset it looks like you deleted the leisure=golf_course area and associated tags for the Littleton Golf Course. Did you mean to do this or perhaps you did accidentally? Thank you :) |
| 71201667 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, thank you for your contributions to Openstreetmap. There are a number of address errors in this changeset. Could you go back and correct these? Thank you :)
|
| 80334099 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, thank you for your contributions to Openstreetmap. There are a number of address errors in this changeset. Could you go back and correct these? Thank you :)
|
| 77403446 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, thank you for your contributions to Openstreetmap. There are a number of address errors in this changeset. Could you go back and correct these? Thank you :) https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-105.04910&lat=39.62345&zoom=16&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber_lenient,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way |
| 73395704 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, thank you for your contributions to Openstreetmap. There are a number of address errors in this changeset. Could you go back and correct these? Thank you :) https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-105.04910&lat=39.62345&zoom=16&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber_lenient,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way |
| 80005059 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, thank you for your contributions to Openstreetmap. There are a few address errors in this changeset. Could you go back and correct these? Below is a link displaying the problems. Thank you :) https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-105.02910&lat=39.60573&zoom=16&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber_lenient,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way |
| 77402468 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, thank you for your contributions to Openstreetmap. There are a number of address errors in this changeset. Below is a link displaying them. Could you go back and correct these? Thank you :) https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-104.99530&lat=39.57860&zoom=16&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber_lenient,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way |
| 73089179 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, thank you for your contributions to Openstreetmap. There are a number of address errors in this changeset. Below is a link displaying them. Could you go back and correct these? Thank you :) https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-105.01950&lat=39.58227&zoom=17&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber_lenient,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way |
| 73395360 | almost 6 years ago | Hello, thank you for your contributions to Openstreetmap. There are a number of address errors in this changeset. Could you go back and correct these? Thank you :)
|