Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. Could you make future changesets smaller so it's easier to see what is being changed? Thanks :)

Hello and thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset it looks like you've incorrectly deleted numerous buildings that were created long ago. Could you please go back and replace these buildings and keep the editing history? Thanks. Also, just so you know, after you deleted the original school building, DSST Byers Middle and High School, the new building you replaced it with has some odd characteristics. The height is tagged as, "0" and the building is tagged as, "foundation/ruin". Are you saying this building has been torn down? Additionally, the new building crosses roads, which would not be correct. Could you go back and fix these issues? Thanks :)

Hello and thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset it looks like you've incorrectly deleted a building that was created years ago. Could you please go back and replace this building and keep the editing history? Thanks :) Also, you've created a new building on top of an older building, so we have a building on top of another building. Could you go back and correct this? Thanks :)

Hello and thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset it looks like you've incorrectly deleted five buildings that were created years ago. Could you please go back and replace these buildings and keep the editing history? Thanks :) Also, quite a few of the buildings you've created in this area are not "squared". Please keep in mind that in OSM, if buildings should have square corners you can use the shortcut "q" to square them. Thanks :)

Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. Could you make future changesets smaller so it's easier to see what is being changed? Thanks :)

Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. Could you make future changesets smaller so it's easier to see what is being changed? Thanks :)

Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. Could you make future changesets smaller so it's easier to see what is being changed? Thanks :)

Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. Could you make future changesets smaller so it's easier to see what is being changed? This changeset extends from Las Vegas to Boston. Thanks :)

Also, I think you want a steeper angle on your skillion? I don't know what the default angle is for f4map, but you can take the guess work out of the equation by entering a value. Just enter, roof_height=* This value tells the renderer how much of the building part should be dedicated to the roof shape. For example, a value of 1 would make a skillion slant almost unnoticeable. A value of 3 or 4 would make the slant deeper than it's currently displaying. Do you know the actual height of the Industry building? If you could find it and enter it into the building tag, it would make rooftop element mapping much easier :)

A skillion roof needs a few modifiers to make it look right. When I work with this roof type, I have to imagine I'm a raindrop hurtling down towards the skillion roof. When I hit the roof, which direction will I flow down the roof? Based on a 360-degree circle, the direction I flow down the roof is the value that has to be placed in the tag. As it is, this renderer has the skillion angle facing the wrong way - I think. https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=39.7709709&lon=-104.9708090&zoom=20&camera.theta=72.044&camera.phi=35.753

Howdy! I guess you knew I'd be watching :) This is some nice 3D work. The choice of skillion surprised me. Skillion is one of those oddball roof shapes. I can't find any actual images of the roof here. Do you have any you'd care to upload to Mapillary? ;) I could only find the link below. Is this model Concept3D work? https://rinoartdistrict.org/go/industry-rino-station

I use OSM Inspector, https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
keep right, https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=39.95356&lon=-75.12364
and osmose.openstreetmap.fr
OSM Inspector updates about every 24 hours

Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset you added a proposed element. This is popping up as an error on QA tools. Just so you know, the correct way to tag proposed elements is; "The way to tag planned features is to use the main tag (Key, e.g. highway, railway, amenity, aeroway, ...) and add proposed as value. Then you create another tag proposed=* with x being the <value you usually would put on the main tag>." You can find this information in the link below. Thanks :) proposed=*?uselang=en-US

Very nice 3D work here on a difficult project. Not an easy task at all ;)

Your 3D work here is excellent. All the tags look great - except the two areas weren't tagged with building:part=yes. Other than that, it's all great. I updated the tags so you can see how they should look ;)

Excellent 3D work here. The portico looks great :)

Very nice 3D work here :) The only issue is that the building has a "colour" assigned on the north wing, but still lacks tags on the center area and the southern wing. You can view it on F4map: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=39.8156839&lon=-105.0829097&zoom=20&camera.theta=61.272&camera.phi=116.597

Good 3D edits here. Instead of building:part=roof, we need to use building:part=yes. We can add additional roof tags to the building:part=yes area afterward. All your work is well done and tight. I've changed just a few small things. Good job :)

I changed a few of the 3D tags here so you can see how they should be done. Thanks :)

I changed a few of the 3D tags here so you can see how they should be done. Thanks :)