chachafish's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 66776602 | almost 7 years ago | Hello Ferchino83, in this changeset you have deleted traffic signals and added junction=yes incorrectly. Can you please correct these errors? Thank you |
| 66775043 | almost 7 years ago | Hello Ferchino83, in this changeset you have deleted traffic signals and added junction=yes incorrectly. Can you please correct these errors? Thank you |
| 66465390 | almost 7 years ago | Hello, Way: 664727585 is an untagged line. Did you mean for this to represent something? Thank you :) |
| 66466580 | almost 7 years ago | Hello, Way: 664744551 is an untagged line. Did you mean for this to represent something? Thank you :) |
| 66520530 | almost 7 years ago | Hello, Way: 665187882 is also an untagged line. Is this supposed to represent something? Thanks |
| 66520530 | almost 7 years ago | Hello, Way: 665187675 is an untagged line. Is this supposed to represent something? Thank you :) |
| 66784647 | almost 7 years ago | Good morning, Ferchino83. Thank you for your response. On numerous occasions chachafish and Polarbear-repair have tried to contact you because you are deleting a large number of traffic lights, adding “junction=yes” incorrectly and not responding to changeset comments. The DWG issued you a block. A DWG member asked me to revert your edits in order to repair the damage and so, your changesets have been reverted. Nobody wanted to revert your edits, but no communication was received from you. Kindly do not delete traffic lights which exist. You can learn the proper of use junction=yes in the links below. Sincerely, chachafish
|
| 66784358 | almost 7 years ago | Good morning, Ferchino83. Thank you for your response. On numerous occasions chachafish and Polarbear-repair have tried to contact you because you are deleting a large number of traffic lights, adding “junction=yes” incorrectly and not responding to changeset comments. The DWG issued you a block. A DWG member asked me to revert your edits in order to repair the damage and so, your changesets have been reverted. Nobody wanted to revert your edits, but no communication was received from you. Kindly do not delete traffic lights which exist. You can learn the proper of use junction=yes in the links below. Sincerely, chachafish
|
| 66778866 | almost 7 years ago | Good morning, Ferchino83. Thank you for your response. On numerous occasions chachafish and Polarbear-repair have tried to contact you because you are deleting a large number of traffic lights, adding “junction=yes” incorrectly and not responding to changeset comments. The DWG issued you a block. A DWG member asked me to revert your edits in order to repair the damage and so, your changesets have been reverted. Nobody wanted to revert your edits, but no communication was received from you. Kindly do not delete traffic lights which exist. You can learn the proper of use junction=yes in the links below. Sincerely, chachafish
|
| 66785294 | almost 7 years ago | Good morning, Ferchino83. Thank you for your response. On numerous occasions chachafish and Polarbear-repair have tried to contact you because you are deleting a large number of traffic lights, adding “junction=yes” incorrectly and not responding to changeset comments. The DWG issued you a block. A DWG member asked me to revert your edits in order to repair the damage and so, your changesets have been reverted. Nobody wanted to revert your edits, but no communication was received from you. Kindly do not delete traffic lights which exist. You can learn the proper of use junction=yes in the links below. Sincerely, chachafish
|
| 66800941 | almost 7 years ago | Good morning, Ferchino83. Thank you for your response. On numerous occasions chachafish and Polarbear-repair have tried to contact you because you are deleting a large number of traffic lights, adding “junction=yes” incorrectly and not responding to changeset comments. The DWG issued you a block. A DWG member asked me to revert your edits in order to repair the damage and so, your changesets have been reverted. Nobody wanted to revert your edits, but no communication was received from you. Kindly do not delete traffic lights which exist. You can learn the proper of use junction=yes in the links below. Sincerely, chachafish
|
| 66550725 | almost 7 years ago | Howdy :) Thank you for your work on the map. I'm following up on some OSM Inspector-tagged errors. In this area quite a few roads were changed to untagged lines. Did you mean to create some type of highway tags here? You can see the errors below. Thanks. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=-106.89481&lat=38.82361&zoom=14&overlays=nodes_with_empty_k,ways_with_empty_k,nodes_with_empty_v,ways_with_empty_v,node_tags_with_whitespace,way_tags_with_whitespace,node_with_unusual_char,way_with_unusual_char,node_with_short_or_long_key,way_with_short_or_long_key,nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways,no_feature_tag_nodes,no_feature_tag_ways,ways_without_tags |
| 66666777 | almost 7 years ago | Howdy, thanks for your additions to OSM. Four addresses here have popped up as containing errors; Les Schwab Tire Center, Smashburger, Visionworks, and Starbucks. The reason is they are tagged to "Arapahoe Road", but this street does not exist here. Did you mean to tag them to "East Arapahoe Road" which is just to the south? Thanks :) |
| 66437691 | almost 7 years ago | Ferchino83, will you please go through all your previous edits and correct the errors you created? You have deleted traffic signals at many, many intersections and replaced them with junction=yes. The junction=yes tags you created are incorrect. Deleting traffic signals is also damaging the map. Please return to your edits and correct them. Thank you. |
| 66661564 | almost 7 years ago | No problem. Ferchino83 has not responded to my questions on other changesets. Thank you for making the changes to the wiki ;) |
| 66661564 | almost 7 years ago | You asked user Ferchino83 why he/she deleted highway=traffic_signals. Ferchino83 has not responded to your question yet. I am user chachafish. Chachafish is part of this discussion, but not the one who removed the traffic signals. |
| 66661564 | almost 7 years ago | I'm simply trying to provide examples of good common practice as it relates to the intersection of four divided highways. It's merely an example for Ferchino83. |
| 66661320 | almost 7 years ago | Hello, thank you for your additions to OSM. You changed this residential building to a car dealership with six levels. Has this building actually changed from residences to six levels of a car dealership? |
| 66659783 | almost 7 years ago | |
| 66659783 | almost 7 years ago | Hello, thank you for your additions to OSM. I see you are adding junction=yes to many intersections, for example node: 1793463198. The junction=yes tag should only be used where street names are not used. Some countries do not use street names, but they use junction names. The tag junction should only be used when a specific junction has a specific name. Can you delete your additions of junction=yes? Thank you :) |