Three years after that edit, I can't remember about it. Anyway, thanks for the comment and fix.

I'm sorry, but I can't remember about that changeset which is 5 years old. If you are a local mapper, perhaps you can check on the ground what this way belongs to.

Tranquilo, no lo he cambiado. Hasta ahora estaba el límite administrativo, que se supone que coincide con el curso del río de la Plata, y por otro lado el río (waterway=river), que estaba pintado por otro lado. Lo que he hecho ha sido hacer coincidir el río con el límite administrativo, sin modificar este último.

Hola
He visto que en este conjunto de cambios has roto la relación que delimitaba el casco urbano de Sanlúcar de Barrameda: has borrado una de las vías que la formaban y has eliminado las etiquetas. ¿Podrías restaurar esos datos? No utilizo Potlach, pero supongo que al igual que JOSM te avisará de los errores existentes en los datos antes de subirlos. Deberías revisar esos avisos por si estás rompiendo algo con tus cambios antes de subirlos.

Hello BeKri
I took the info from railway=level_crossing nodes on Hellensteinstraße (nodes 186969983 and 616310503) already existing on that street.

The source is data already in OSM coming from nodes tagged maxheight=*. In case of doubt, bing imagery is used to clarify. As a background, I usually keep the original node, so that anyone can check the information and the source if it contains one.
@ndm: you are right, but meters is the default value according to maxheight description in the wiki (1), but there's no problem in leaving it in feet.
(1) maxheight=*

No problem at all. It's good to have people supervising possible errors in changeset.

I'm not sure I catch what you mean. I applied height restriction only to Terry avenue portion under Skeldergate Bridge, which I think is OK. If space under bridge is 8'6'' it affects all vehicles, no matter where they come from. Please correct me if I'm wrong or I'm missing something

Hello
I check restriction from node affects all a way before moving values, but maybe I missed something. Can you tell me what way are you talking about? (Changeset involves several ways).

You are absolutely right about that. I have fixed it.

Hello
I did it following recommendation for maxheigth on ways from English wiki, which is suppose to be the most up to date. Didn't know about Russian wiki, sorry. Feel free to revert if you find it more convenient.

OK

What problem do you see with that?

I have used the official sites of the banks as source, but I must admit I'm not sure about the consistency of the names around the world. I have received some other comments about these kind of edits and have stopped making them. I you find any error in my edits, feel free to revert any change.

I'm sorry for any inconvenience caused. I'll stop such edits.

Thanks for the hint! All changes were made without any bot or script, so I thought it wasn't a mechanical edit. I didn't know these human edits were considered "Automated edits"

OK, I'll have that in mind

?

I'm correcting different errors in bank and atm tagging all around the world, so the changesets cover those big areas you see, it's intended. Thanks for taking care about it.

Why not? This change set includes several elements; most of the modified tags were simply incorrect but perhaps I used Bing to get better information about a given element. If you supply some details about the element modified I would try to give a more detailed answer.