Also is node/7562226080 a duplicate of way/212500738?

Hey,
there is already a way/45743889 for the Rumi Gate.
Is this gate indeed the one described there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumi_Darwaza? Then a Wikipedia article could be referenced.
Why did you add node/7562226079 as a memorial? Is there a memorial next to the gate? Or is the gate the memorial.
CamelCaseNick

Sind Leeste und Erichshof Ortsteile von Weyhe? (also relation/20101) So lese ich den Wikipedia-Artikel de:Weyhe.
Hier liegt aber Leeste in Erichshof? Außerdem passen jetzt Wikipedia- und Wikidata-Tag nicht zusammen.

Hey,
what do you mean at node/7598642015 with the artist_name, inscription, start_date, wikipedia tags?
CamelCaseNick

I think, it should be wikidata=Q1226524?

Hey,
why the wikipedia link (missing the de:) to Dinkelacker-Schwaben Bräu and the wikidata link to Dinkelacker and not Dinkelacker-Schwaben Bräu?
CamelCaseNick

Why did you remove the essential language part of the wikipedia tag?

The previously tagged article de:Mendrisio (Kreis) was moved to de:Kreis Mendrisio without a redirect in place.

Hey,
you removed the Wikipedia and Wikidata links for the lake.
Even though Wikipedia doesn't currently use the official name of it, the article is still about this lake, isn't it?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
this Wikipedia is no invalid. Maybe
wikipedia=gl:Cristosende, A Teixeira
for https://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cristosende,_A_Teixeira? And is this that and not https://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cristosende,_Cristosende,_A_Teixeira?
CamelCaseNick

Hallo,

> ich weiß nicht genau, wie man das nennt
ja, das ist eine Profanierung o. Entweihung.

> Ich verstehe dich so, dass du ein Merkmal dran lassen willst, weil das Gebäude als Ex-Kirche besichtigt werden könnte?
Ja, das war mein Ansinn.

> Es sollte aber nicht christlich oder katholisch dranstehen, das trifft nicht zu.
Daher hatte ich den disused:amenity im Vorschlag. Um klar deutlich zu machen, dass man es als Kirchen-architektonisches Werk sehen kann, aber nicht mehr als Gebetsstätte und Ort der Glaubensausübung.

> Bin auch kein Profi-Karthograf.
Ich auch nicht.

> Wen es dir möglich ist, schicke mir bitte mal einen Link
Der Link zu Wikidata ist http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q42301991. Dieser Wikidata-Eintrag ist auch verbunden mit dem Wikipedia-Artikel zu der ehemaligen Kirche: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Theresia_vom_Kinde_Jesu_(Eschede).

CamelCaseNick

Hey,
why did you delete multiple name tags and the link to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15166148?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
this seems odd to me. You have added a Wikidata tag for a short film here a fixed the Wikipedia tag accordingly.
As you may already know: The film is solely shown here. And I couldn't find anything but this film, that is shown here.
This theater is not a film nevertheless. I thought about using subject:* tagging, but that isn't 100 % correct as well.
CamelCaseNick

p.s.: Due to a now fixed bug in the task manager I had the same task.

Wikidata hat mit Q42301991 ein Kirchengebäude. building=church ist doch auch für nicht genutzte Kirchen korrekt.

Ich wäre dafür

disused:amenity=place_of_worship
building=church
image=File:Eschede Kirche Theresia.JPG
name=St. Theresia vom Kinde Jesu
wikidata=Q42301991

(wieder) hinzuzufügen. Das Gebäude ist ja noch da, oder?

CamelCaseNick

Thanks!
Re-added in changeset/85943639.

Hey,
why did you remove the links to https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%8A_%D8%BA%D9%8A%D8%B1 and to http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1649069 and multiple names.
What are your sources? Isn't “Image Mondiales Esri Beta” aerial imagery?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
you removed also the link to https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%B5nnuste_Jumala_Ilmumise_kirik.
Sometimes iD deletes links to Wikipedia etc. when names are added, so maybe it was an accident.
Did you mean it or was it such an accident?
CamelCaseNick

Thank You for first edit.

I have some issues with them: You have removed the tag place=hamlet, that tells us, that it is a hamlet.
You also removed the link to Wikidata. And replace the Wikipedia link with an invalid one.
Isn't https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackfoot,_Alberta this place?
Would you please explain “I live here and the way it was before doesn't show up in Canada”?
The name in OpenStreetMap shouldn't be necessarily the official one. For that we have tags like official_name=*. The name would be the “common name”. If the name is not correct, what would it be? What would you call it in everyday language or what would an informal sign say?

Due to these problems, I have reverted your changeset in changeset/85854894.
I hope, that the issues a raised, can be easily resolved. And I hope this id not discourage you from future contributions.

CamelCaseNick

Sorry, the first link was the book about the tree sitting on the tree Luna written be the participant of the tree sitting.
Luna's item is http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6703503.

Okay, so now http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7746663 is about the tree Luna and http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q95308630 about the tree sitting.

And yes, the meaning of name:wikidata and name:etymology:wikidata would need a proper discussion. Pretty sure, the changeset comments aren't the best place for it though.