Hi kentact,

Could you please explain why you use the tag “destination:lang:sr” and other variants? When we look at the wiki page for that tag, we see that it is abandoned and not in use (see here).

I’m curious if you contacted the community before adding those characters en masse, as I don’t see any discussion about it anywhere. The official forum for OpenStreetMap in Serbia can be found here.

I kindly request that you start a topic related to this issue on the official channel. Until a consensus is reached regarding adding the “destination:lang:*” tag, I recommend temporarily stopping further additions. Otherwise, I will write a complaint to DWG regarding this matter.

These decisions should be made collectively within the community, rather than by an individual setting rules unilaterally.

I saw that you added to 2257 relations. I would like to ask you once again to stop adding until you have agreed and received approval from the OSM Serbia community.

All best borovac

@ika-chan sorry, I see now that you have already fixed the intersection.

@ika-chan! should I fix the geometry of the intersection according to the imagery? Or will the Greek community solve it?
We came across several such examples from this @Delda Evas ALL user where a regular T intersection is modeled like this.

Hello Delta Evas ALL,

Could you provide some more info regarding this junction? Looking at available sources this junction looks like a simple T restriction. What was the reason for remodeling? Were there any recent reconstructions going on there?

Here are the coordinates and link to the junction: 39.7985282, 21.1734184 osm.org/#map=19/39.79850/21.17338

All best Borovac

Cao Savo,

vidim da dosta stavljas living street gde ne bi trebalo da bude living street ovu ulicu si sa service prebacio u living_stret (highway=living_street) umesto u highway=presidential.
To dosta utice na routing, i living_street ne predstavlja ulicu gde ljudi zive vez ulicu izuzetno male brzine tu je maxspee=10 i da bi neka ulica bila living street mora da ima ovakav znak kao sto ima ova ulica (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=44.976427777778&lng=20.164836111111&z=17&pKey=842777696312414&focus=photo&x=0.5058731116105611&y=0.4625984624248233&zoom=0)
S postovanjem Borovac

Hvala, srecni praznici… 😄

OK, hvala…
Nista kada se importuju sve adrese u podunavlju napravicu tabelu sa onim sto je uneseno i sa RGZ podacima pa se dogovaramo dalje da se to prekontrolise.
Postoji mogucnos da su iz RGZ-a dodeli nove brojeve i da ljudi jednostavno nisu zameni brojeve, ali takodje postoji mogucnost da i RGZ ima pogresne podatke.

Dogovoreno, izvucicu ti i ostale posto ima za sad 80kom koji se ne poklapaju sa RGZ-ovim podacima.
Ali kad zavrsim import svi adrenih podataka u podunavlju.

Cao,
moze li jedna molbica, da li mozes da proveris adrese u Dimitrija Tucovica ima dosta adresa koje si dodao, a da se ne poklapaju sa podacima iz RGZ-a... Ja sam ostavio tvoje i dodao nodove iz RGZ-a i stavio tag note=Needs survey kako bi mogli da proverimo sporne adrese.
Hvala unapred Borovac

Nemoj da gledas na renderovanje... :)
osm.or je baza podataka nisu mape i tamo je prikaz cisto informativnog karaktera...

Cao Savo
molim te nemoj menjati area:highway tag za highway tag ili u kombinaciji sa area=yes jer je to neispravna kombinacija sa oblast oko puta koja pravi problema tokom rutiranja.
Primenu mozes pogledati na ovoj wiki stranici: area:highway=*
Sve najbolje Milan.

Hi Stalker61,
I am trying to fix intersection ways and see that one has a "winter_road=yes" tag.
(way/456333085) This way has intersections with 3 other ways:
1.way/590548795
2.way/590548795
3.way/818683982
When I looked on Wiki for that tag I saw that this type of road needs to have a "seasonal=winter" tag. winter_road=*. But I am not sure about the connection between whether we need to have a common point between them or not. (60.8010707, 70.5216919). I would like to consult with you because of the profitability of the roads.

Ma znam, ali je fora sto tu pravi bespotrebno preklapanje puteva, a niko od provajdera OsmAnd, MagicEart, Apple maps ne uzimaju u obzir tu kombinaciju zbog problema sa rutiranjem dok area:highway tag kupe i renderuje i sto je najbitnije ne pravi problem za rutiranjem i sa preklapanjem puteva.
Vise je stvar funkcionalnosti, na primer area:highway=pedestrian je mnogo funkcionalnije resenje i pritom nema da se preklapaju 2 way-a koji na sebi imaju highway atribute.

Pozdrav Muki,
da li mogu da te pitam zasto si tag area:highway zamenio sa neispravnom kombinacijom area=yes + highway=* i sa time napravio na pojedinim mestima duplu geometriju gde ide highway=* preko highway=*?
Tag area:highway je ispravan nacin kojim se prave oblasti oko puta. area:highway=*
Ta oznaka ne pravi preklapanja kao ni keepriht greske kao sto pravi neispravna kombinacija area=yes + highway=* i kada radi ruting ne rutira po obodima puteva vec rutira po mrezi puteva.
S postovanjem Borovac

Hi Tomas,
I apologize for deleting the information about public transport, it was accidental.
I will pay more attention in the future.
All best Borovac

Hi Map-Finder

Can you please check this relations: 13299715/13299713/13299714
On this relation missing one part for this turn restriction.
I looking this turn restrictions but I do not have street level imagery with which I can fix this turn restrictions.

Thanks in advance Borovac

Hi Map-Finder

Can you please check this relations: 13299711/13299712
On this relation missing one part for this turn restriction.
I looking this turn restrictions but I do not have street level imagery with which I can fix this turn restrictions.

Thanks in advance Borovac

Also find this relation:13298656 where is missing "from" in turn restriction relation.

Hi Map-Finder

Can you please check this two relations: 13298655/13298654
On this relations two missing some way for this turn restrictions.
I looking this turn restrictions but I do not have street level imagery with which I can fix this two turn restrictions.

Thanks in advance Borovac

Hi Map-Finder

Also for relation/13298646 missing "from" way.

Thanks in advance Borovac