Hi Paul. Thanks for fixing the road and the city on your house. I feel like I should explain that I did the address import in 2020 and one of the many mistake I made was to mess up the addr:city tags. I'm making my way back through and fixing them but, in the mean-time, you may notice the same issue on nearby addresses. I'll eventually get to them but don't let that stop you from fixing things. Please ask if you have questions, and welcome to OSM. -Alex
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114510385

I should have also mentioned that bing streetview is integrated into iD (the editor you're using). On the right-hand toolbar, click 'map data' -> 'photo overlays' -> 'bing streetside'.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114499714

Thank you for your edits. FYI referencing google as a source for editing OSM is taboo. Microsoft bing has a street-view which is allowed. Please ask if you have questions. -Alex
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114499017

I noticed you marked 'abandoned=yes' on some of these airport features. How do you know?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114161303

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. I see you're using the description tag to mark roads as private but GPS routing engines won't understand that description because they aren't human. I'd suggest removing the description tag from both of these roads and instead adding 'access=private'.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114189084

Regarding node/9280820993, looks like you've got a restaurant inside of another restaurant with the same address but a different name. Do both of them exist?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114187005

Regarding "I am the new trail master for Richmond Snowmobile club and am fixing our trail map", congratulations and thank you. Welcome to OSM and please ask if you have any questions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114116872

Looks like you're on a swimming pool kick. Consider adding access=private when it's someone's backyard so it doesn't look like a community pool.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114007408

Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits. Since this was your first edit, I wanted to let you know that it's been reviewed and looks good. -Alex
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113811827

Oh, and you added one of your lots as a part of the official boundary of Richmond (by assigning it as a member of the relation) which is what made me look at your change. Please do be careful not to adjust town boundaries and ask if you have questions. -Alex
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112394845

Welcome to OSM. I've reviewed you change and made a few corrections. The biggest issue is that you were using Name to describe was something is but that's what other tags are for. Example, I could incorrectly name myself "6 foot adult male human" or I could use tags "height=6 feet", "age=adult", "gender=male" and "species=human". Descriptive tags are more machine readable and useful in OSM.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112394845

Thanks for adding this building (and the others). When you add a building and put an address on it, please delete the the node which previously had that address, otherwise there are two elements with the same address. In this case, that would be to delete node/7176598018, (after making sure any/all details on the node have been put on the building, I noticed you didn't add addr:postcode to the building)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113702048

Part of the road you labeled sidewak=no has a sidewalk on the west side. I added it. Also, hi. -Alex.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113716707

Welcome to OSM.
I made a few changes after reviewing your edit:
* I deleted the residential land use area because it was attached to the roads, included a forest, avoided houses for some reason, and overlapped other land use areas.
* I removed the name "camp" from the address you added. Name is more of "what does the public call this thing" than "what do you call this thing".
* I changed your driveway from a road to a driveway.
* I removed the "name=driveway" from your driveway. Again, maybe you call it that, but that isn't it's public name.
* I deleted an address node farther south that has the same address details as the one you added, assuming the one you added is more accurate.
Let me know if you have any questions or if you think I messed something up. -Alex

Thanks for adding this street. I've updated the name to be Title Case.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111258816

oh... I just left the same comment twice. Too much coffee, sorry about that.

Hi, the address you added already existed as a node. node/7343668928. Please consider merging the two elements so there are not two of them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113098635

Many of the roads you changed to tertiary I think would be better as service roads, parking isles, or unclassified. Check out the wiki for more info highway=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113100845

There was already a parking lot here as a node (node/7564192727). Now there is a parking lot in a parking lot. Please consider merging the two elements together so there is only one parking lot.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113419775

It looks like you've put the address as the name of this building. In most cases the address is better off in address tags (where it already is) and it's ok for the name to be empty.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113419949