I see you removed the maxheight on the highway but that's one of the restrictions (as much as max speed). See https://www.maineturnpike.com/Business-With-MTA/Policies-Rules.aspx
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101886244

I've put it back, presuming you removed it by mistake. If that's not the case, let's chat. Have a nice day.

When I spotted this, I went looking for what the real name might be. I couldn't find one in the GNIS database. It's totally fine for things to not have a name. Many things don't.

They way you've used this tag seems to be listed undo the section titled "when not to use this tag" here junction=yes
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101864360

Thanks for fixing this street name!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101796876

Hi. Since you've given a feature a name that resembles your user name and you didn't provide a source for your edit, it looks like it could be vandalism. Could you please provide a reference for the name of this pond?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101675824

Hi, I see that you removed the boundary tag from Limington... Could you please explain why? Regarding relation/2021655.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101499035

I put back what was there 'highway=construction' which means "it looks like someone is building something that cars will be able to go over, but don't try to send traffic this way yet". That's all I can see from the imagery, the same as the person who put that road there. If you have more up-to-date information, feel free to upgrade it (maybe to service or driveway)

Hi, I see you deleted way/782245043 and commented "Deleted road that doesn't exist". I noticed that old imagery doesn't show a road here, but new imagery does. I wonder if you were looking at the old imagery?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101603135

I've fixed it.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101463337

I've got bad news. That road had the correct official name. Might be worth adding a note="this is real" tag to it.
https://www.maine.gov/mdot/mapviewer/?show=Roads%20General%2CState%20Urban%2CTown%20and%20County%20Boundaries%2CWater%20Bodies&hide=Conserved%20Lands%2CContours%2CContours%20-%202%20foot%2CFederal%20Urban%2CInterstate%20Interchanges%2CMEDOT%20Regions%2CMetropolitan%20Planning%20Areas%202015%2CRail%20Bridges%2CWetlands&added=Pavement%20Marking%20Sites%2CMost%20Recent%20Highway%20Treatment%2CNational%20Highway%20System%2CNAIP%202015&transparency=100&center=44.488541%2C-69.933776&z=2587
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101463337

Thanks for adding these paths. I might have used highway=path for these but I haven't seen them in person. Further reading: osm.wiki/Path_controversy#Kinds_of_paths
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101456922

Thanks for adding these islets and making them role:inner for the relation. I would move the details (like name) from the original boundary (way/146140456) to the relation. As it is, the way and the relation both have names, and they don't agree.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101425782

Based on the name you gave way/928496528 "Organic Garden", I wonder if leisure=garden would be more appropriate than landuse=meadow?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101219976

I'm really curious about your decision to add this turn restriction. I see there is a sign there, but it is facing south west and you added a restriction from the North East
relation/10415026

Hi. I noticed the many turn restrictions you added at the corner of Mariner Way and Alfred Street. I see that there is a no-u-turn sign when approaching from the east. I was wondering if you also saw no-u-turn signs from the other directions, or, if not, what motivated you to add the other turn restrictions?
I know, I'm asking you to remember something from 9 months ago. Consider it a memory test.

It looks as though you may have added peoples names to OSM. If that's what's happened, they should be cleaned up. If these are features of the real world, could you please explain what they are? Nodes 7617145330, 7617145331, 7617145332, 7617145333
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86589991

layer=-1 for way#302532272 would mean that the walkway is underground but the satellite imagery seems to show it above ground. What were you trying to achieve here? -Alex
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86748155

I'd like to understand why you've added all these turn restrictions. Does each one represent a "no u turn" sign? That seems unlikely in most of these places like Relation:11246186.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87218552

The many no-u-turn restrictions inside a parking lot seem a little excessive. example: relation/11239633