Thanks for mapping! Please only add the "Name" field if you know the name of the feature. In this case it looks like you added hashtags as the name, which are added when you hit "save"

Thanks for mapping. Are these two buildings really cafes? If not please only add things you can see from imagery.

Thanks for mapping! Please only add the "name" tag if you know the name of the feature. These names are actually hashtags that you add when saving your changesets. Thanks!

Hello, it looks like you have deleted Lake Chad. Can you explain what you are trying to do here, and also what #OSM_237 is?

Thanks for mapping. Please don't copy other maps for OpenStreetMap. There is more information here osm.wiki/FAQ

Also feel free to contact the US community for additional help or questions osm.wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States

Thanks for mapping. Please don't copy other maps for OpenStreetMap. There is more information here osm.wiki/FAQ

Also feel free to contact the US community for additional help or questions osm.wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States

Thanks for mapping. Please don't copy other maps for OpenStreetMap. There is more information here osm.wiki/FAQ

Also feel free to contact the US community for additional help or questions osm.wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States

Hi, what are these edits? The tags you are using don't match any OpenStreetMap tags.

Hi DFFYou, thanks for mapping! I noticed in a few places (changeset/82488981/ at osm.org/#map=18/4.677797/101.122827 and changeset/82574014/ at osm.org/#map=19/4.60051/101.07032) where data has been deleted or deleted and remade. In both cases, the deleted features or original modeling can be seen in ESRI World Imagery. Deleting data also deletes all the history of that features. Best practice is to keep these features in the data and remodel using the existing ways if necessary based on OSM Best Practices: osm.wiki/Good_practice.
I also notice you add access tags or turn restrictions. Do you have local knowledge of this area or a resource used to verify the access tags are valid? The OSM wiki has helpful information on access and restriction usage (see access=*, osm.wiki/Relation:restriction).
Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions!

Hi DFFYou, thanks for mapping! I noticed in a few places (changeset/82488981/ at osm.org/#map=18/4.677797/101.122827 and changeset/82574014/ at osm.org/#map=19/4.60051/101.07032) where data has been deleted or deleted and remade. In both cases, the deleted features or original modeling can be seen in ESRI World Imagery. Deleting data also deletes all the history of that features. Best practice is to keep these features in the data and remodel using the existing ways if necessary based on OSM Best Practices: osm.wiki/Good_practice.

I also notice you add access tags or turn restrictions. Do you have local knowledge of this area or a resource used to verify the access tags are valid? The OSM wiki has helpful information on access and restriction usage (see access=*, osm.wiki/Relation:restriction).

Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions!

Thanks for mapping! When mapping buildings please try to make them perfect rectangles or squares, and click the q button on your keyboard which will make all corners 90 degrees

Thanks for mapping! When mapping buildings please try to make them perfect rectangles or squares, and click the q button on your keyboard which will make all corners 90 degrees

Hola. Muchos mapeadores han preguntado por qué está cambiando caminos como este a"track", pero nunca respondió: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3392. El wiki de OSM dice "No use track para representar calles sin pavimentar en áreas urbanizadas": highway=track. Estas deben ser residenciales.

Many mappers have asked why you are changing roads like this to track but you’ve never replied: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3392. The OSM wiki says “Do not use tracks to represent unpaved streets in built-up areas": highway=track. These should be residential.

Hello. I don't believe this should be a motorway. Motorways are only roads with controlled access, which means there should be no at-grade intersections or roundabouts:
highway=motorway
Here are intersections: osm.org/#map=20/40.163651965663476/44.404907544573106

Also if you can be a bit more descriptive in your changeset comments that would be great. In this changeset I don't see changing any borders or buildings.

Hi, it looks like you and @Արման are making the same comments. Are you all part of the same effort?

Here are some regular intersections, for example, which would suggest it is not a motorway osm.org/#map=18/40.17546/44.50013

Hello. I don't believe this should be a motorway. Motorways are only roads with controlled access, which means there should be no at-grade intersections or roundabouts:
highway=motorway
Users have pointed this out to you before: changeset/62660268#map=10/40.5724/44.8645
changeset/79723444

I agree with Wisdom!!, I don't think this should be a motorway per the OSM highway guidelines

Hi, please be careful with overlapping roads. I fixed it.

Thanks for mapping. Please watch for overlapping roads. I have fixed it here.