andrewsh's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 21014566 | about 10 years ago | Ну теперь уже, когда katpatuka пофиксил. А не были. Katpatuka был жутко недоволен. |
| 21014566 | about 10 years ago | Вообще говоря, делить границу на 107 маленьких частей — не очень хорошая идея. Не стоит так делать впредь. |
| 33440551 | about 10 years ago | Hello wonchs91, I'm not able to find anything in this area on any satellite images or on any other maps. Could you please explain where do the data come from? Cheers,
|
| 35151699 | about 10 years ago | This doesn't look real; where do the data come from? |
| 34924078 | about 10 years ago | …že sa jednoznačne to dá otagovať. |
| 34924078 | about 10 years ago | Nie je nič neobvyklého, ale neznamená to, že to je potrebné a to má byť. Ako mať nekonzistentné adresy na POI a budovách, tak lepšie ich mať len na budovách, za podmienkou že sa jednoznačne to otagovať. |
| 34924078 | about 10 years ago | Pretože adresu už majú. |
| 34841569 | about 10 years ago | Multiple addresses is one of the use cases for having addresses on POIs, I never argued that. |
| 34841569 | about 10 years ago | If some software can't figure the address from the building the POI is in, it's defective software and it needs to be fixed. |
| 34841569 | about 10 years ago | How does the end user benefit from excessive or wrong data? |
| 34841569 | about 10 years ago | No, it usualy does not apply to the building, as normally there are multiple POIs in the building except when it's a building specifically built for some purpose (in that case it's okay to have POI tags on the whole building). |
| 34841569 | about 10 years ago | Hello, Thanks for your contribution, but there's no need to add extra duplicate data: the addresses of these places are already on the buildings there in, so adding them to the places themselves increases duplication and adds some confusion if the address information is not exactly the same (as is in your case). If you want to improve addresses, it's better to unify them and remove from POIs where appropriate, moving them to the buildings instead. |
| 30451655 | over 10 years ago | Teh Wow. |
| 28724296 | almost 11 years ago | Revertol som to. |
| 28724296 | almost 11 years ago | Takto sa to prosím nerobí. Ak chcete doplniť dáta — v pohode, ale nerozhádzať popri tom existujúce. Kolega-Žilinčan tuším teraz to opraví, ak nie — skúsim ja, ale Vaše dáta žiaľ budú zmazané. Navrhujem nasledovné: preštudujte si dobré ako sa obyčajne mapuje celkovo v OpenStreetMap a najmä na Slovensku. Ešte odporúčam sa zapojiť do diskusie na <osm_sk@googlegroups.com> alebo <http://groups.google.com/group/osm_sk>. Ďakujem za pochopenie. |
| 28471641 | almost 11 years ago | Mergen, I think it's not a good idea to add low-cost flights to OSM, at least not in the specific way you did. Добавлять лоукостеры в ОСМ — не самая лучшая идея вообще, ну и точно уж не таким способом, как это сделано в этом случае. |
| 28471641 | almost 11 years ago | Seems like a new branch of Eurotunnel… |
| 28236423 | almost 11 years ago | Далеко уплыл, однако! |
| 28304543 | almost 11 years ago | Aha, Markdown tu nefunguje. |
| 28304543 | almost 11 years ago | Hej, už vidím, asi bazén je tuná, [kde budova chýba](http://i.imgur.com/VUozVoQ.png), ale ten kurt je asi vpravo vedľa. |