althios Blogeintrag-Kommentare

Änderungssatz	Zeitpunkt	Kommentar
72621105	vor über 5 Jahren	Bonjour Charles, Oui, je pense que c'est le cas. Toutefois, les travaux et amemagements sont peut etre encore differents, 1 an apres. Et je ne peux plus verifier sur place. Pas d'imagerie recente et haute qualite non plus...
83100456	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83100456
83100251	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83100251
83098158	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83098158
83089420	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83089420
83089249	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83089249
83068513	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83068513
83066113	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83066113
83062835	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83062835
83046344	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83046344
83045091	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83045091
83044801	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83044801
83044373	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83044373
83043663	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83043663
83014348	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83014348
82999645	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82999645
82999361	vor fast 6 Jahren	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82999361
72875293	vor über 6 Jahren	> je suis revenu sur la version précédente de way/210550884/history Il y a une séparation physique entre la voie principale et la piste cyclable, donc ce n'est pas une bande. Ah tiens, c'est étrange, je n'ai pas vu de séparation physique, mais je n'ai pas fait toute la longueur de l'avenue, d'où mon ajout de commentaire en fixme.
72875293	vor über 6 Jahren	Bonjour StephaneP Vus la configuration et mes souvenirs, l'infrastructure à droite est la voie parallèle séparée, tandis que l'infrastructure à gauche est le cycleway:left. Donc oui, il semble correct de supprimer busway=lane + cycleway=share_busway et de conserver busway:left=opposite_lane + cycleway:left=share_busway
72433228	vor über 6 Jahren	En fait, sur place, à l'accès nord de la rue Louis Delgrès, les panneaux et panonceaux sont tellement tagués qu'il est impossible de comprendre les restrictions d'accès. On va dire que ce n'est pas critique, puisque peu de chance qu'un itinéraire cyclable soit favorisé par ces segments.