althios kommentarer

Ændringssæt	Hvornår	Kommentar
72621105	over 5 år siden	Bonjour Charles, Oui, je pense que c'est le cas. Toutefois, les travaux et amemagements sont peut etre encore differents, 1 an apres. Et je ne peux plus verifier sur place. Pas d'imagerie recente et haute qualite non plus...
83100456	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83100456
83100251	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83100251
83098158	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83098158
83089420	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83089420
83089249	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83089249
83068513	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83068513
83066113	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83066113
83062835	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83062835
83046344	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83046344
83045091	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83045091
83044801	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83044801
83044373	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83044373
83043663	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83043663
83014348	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83014348
82999645	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82999645
82999361	næsten 6 år siden	warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82999361
72875293	over 6 år siden	> je suis revenu sur la version précédente de way/210550884/history Il y a une séparation physique entre la voie principale et la piste cyclable, donc ce n'est pas une bande. Ah tiens, c'est étrange, je n'ai pas vu de séparation physique, mais je n'ai pas fait toute la longueur de l'avenue, d'où mon ajout de commentaire en fixme.
72875293	over 6 år siden	Bonjour StephaneP Vus la configuration et mes souvenirs, l'infrastructure à droite est la voie parallèle séparée, tandis que l'infrastructure à gauche est le cycleway:left. Donc oui, il semble correct de supprimer busway=lane + cycleway=share_busway et de conserver busway:left=opposite_lane + cycleway:left=share_busway
72433228	over 6 år siden	En fait, sur place, à l'accès nord de la rue Louis Delgrès, les panneaux et panonceaux sont tellement tagués qu'il est impossible de comprendre les restrictions d'accès. On va dire que ce n'est pas critique, puisque peu de chance qu'un itinéraire cyclable soit favorisé par ces segments.