This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/40274919 where the changeset comment is:

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/40274913 where the changeset comment is:

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/40274914 where the changeset comment is:

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/40274398 where the changeset comment is:

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/40274718 where the changeset comment is:

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/40274543 where the changeset comment is:

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/40266451 where the changeset comment is:

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/40258772 where the changeset comment is:

I've moved this translation to the "Prince Henry Cliff Walk" way as that, the walk isn't where this POI was placed (that's the Underfalls Walk)

You tagged this one way/409276633 as a library, but it's not. I've fixed it up now, this is a restaurant and the library is round the corner. The LPI Base Map is wrong here.

They don't have relationships, they are all independent. historic=archaeological_site lists other kinds of sites but not middens so I've used site_type=shell_midden for these. I would say they names should be moved to the description key, but I didn't make that change.

I'm tempted to agree with you. I think that boundary=national_park is sufficient. However at mostly in Australia I would have thought that National Park implies "protected area of importance for ildlife, flora, fauna or features of geological or other special interest, which is reserved and managed for conservation and to provide special opportunities for study or research." ... hence also leisure=nature_reserve. In fact leisure=nature_reserve notes the similar tag.

It seems leisure=nature_reserve was changed to leisure=park in this changeset. This isn't appropriate for the Heathcote National Park as it's not consistant with the usage of leisure=park at leisure=park (See also the note at leisure=park#National_Parks)

I'm removing node/316587786 because I'm fairly certain there is no picnic_site at the exact location of the node, and there is a better positioned picnic_site nearby which is probably what this node was meant to map.

Hi Swanilli,

1. I'm not disagreeing about there being cliffs here, hence the natural=cliff tags still remain.

2. Regarding my comment about downstream data users, I can only quote my personal example which is [1]. I'm extracting names of features and using these in the walk description, and non-names like 'cliff' coming from the nameless cliffs you've named are an issue.

[1] http://www.beyondtracks.com/walks/royal-national-park/wattamolla-to-curracurrong-return/

I've gone ahead and reverted this changeset (which only added the name=cliff tags) in changeset/33385884

Perhaps osm.wiki/Relation:destination_sign would be better suited then, it allows you to capture the information about the "Lookout 50m" better. You could also put in the description tag of the lookout a note about the "Lookout - 50m" sign.

The reason I'm making such a fuss about it is because I'm pulling data out of OSM with names of lookouts and I only want the name, no other descriptive information.

I'm not sure if it's changed.

What you describe seems to indicate that the lookout is 50m from the sign, which is informative, rather than forming part of the name. The name tag should just contain the actual name, ie. "Eagles Nest Lookout".

What do you think?

Hi Mike,

What does the 50m mean at Eagles Nest Lookout? It's too low for altitude...

I would like to revert this (ie. remove name=cliff) because they aren't named "cliff", and it's causing issues for downstream data users expecting the name in the name tag.