OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

_stijn_'s Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by _stijn_

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
5271346 _stijn_

The contour of what is drawn here as nature reserve is incorrect and should be larger. I wanted to correct this, but the online editor does not allow to draw the new contour over some of the other features already there: grassland/farmyard/managed forest etc. But those other features also do not reflect the actual situation well: farmyard contour is wrong, parts of the forest is actually grassland or a single tree line, some of the scrub is actually forest whereas other parts are grassland, and so on. What's the best way to tackle this?

4880768 _stijn_

Zie o.a. https://huldenberg.be/sites/default/files/2024-10/Tersaertveld_%20definitieve_goedkeuring.pdf, dit is nu voetweg 37

4880767 _stijn_

Zie o.a. https://huldenberg.be/sites/default/files/2024-10/Tersaertveld_%20definitieve_goedkeuring.pdf, dit is nu voetweg 19

4880764 _stijn_

Zie o.a. https://huldenberg.be/sites/default/files/2024-10/Tersaertveld_%20definitieve_goedkeuring.pdf: dit is nu 'volwaardige' voetweg 41 tot aan Veeweidestraat

4832670

Toen het gebouw nog de Baron's Brasserie huisveste, was dit inderdaad een parking (voor bezoekers). Gezien de brasserie gesloten is en het gebouw te koop staat, is dit geen publieke parking meer.
#osmreport #osmbe

4479922 _stijn_

This used to be 43 (or maybe 43 NEE but that is a rather inconsistent naming scheme), and the link clearly points to it being called 43 as well.

4186221 RaphaelPasloin

missing social facility tag see :

https://www.ganspoel.be/

+ building geometry near here : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2451563545017169