Apologies @user_5358 that was a typo - now fixed

Hi Dave - sorry on reviewing, the footbridge is not on the NCN although it seems either side of it is. The footbridge stayed open during the closure and now the Old Bridge is open to pedestrians only. Will update these. Thanks.

Hm thanks for drawing my attention to this.

Hi @Hiblet. Just been making some edits around the golf course, and had a few things I was not sure about based on your edits? I'm no expert so open to your input but was unsure about:
- The cart path tag has afaik been replaced by highway=path, highway=service, golf_cart=designated (see wiki)
- The paths you've uploaded are duplicating and not coordinated with the existing foot path plots already on the map?
- A lot of the cart paths you've added aren't connected - is this intentional?
- Some of the paths are tagged as shapes rather than lines using area=yes golf=cartpath - I was under the impression they can only be lines?

Appreciate your thoughts and let me know if there is more up to date guidance you are following

Hi Robert - yep my error there in copy and pasting the business' second branch. Have amended under #113412029

Hi DaveF, apologies I've incorrectly tagged these and now amended. Thanks.

Hi Robert. Afraid I think I've duplicated the building and accidentally retained the postcode from another location. Just checked this against onspd and have corrected it. I'm hoping to run a few more checks on other edits of mine soon to ensure I haven't repeated these elsewhere.

Hi Adlid! Sorry about that, I'm new to mapping here and more used to areas with sparse data. I'll have to revisit this in a few days on my pc and use the method you mention, thanks for the info. Best, zendesk.

Resolved, thanks for pointing it out!

https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=91189802+ shows removal of terraces and replacement

Hi FinB2000. I appreciate your amendments. Can I also recommend reverting 91189802 and 90651430 as these also cover the same issue of building deletions.

Also 90848453

Deletions

Deletions

Deletions

My concerns also lie with changesets 90824237 and 90710844. I would really appreciate it if you would revert these changes and discuss next steps with me first.

Hi FinB2000. This is not about whether the edits are intentional. Firstly the content you removed was based on days of extensive surveying performed by myself and as a courtesy you should have discussed it before removing en masse. Secondly, your edits in my opinion do not reflect the nature of the buildings on the ground. Your response does not seem to engage with this issue at all and I'm concerned you haven't responded to my comments. Ultimately OSM is based on consensus and right now having spoken with the IRC Talk-GB group the response has been that your edit should be reverted. Please appreciate I am not arguing with you, I am merely concerned that you have removed a lot of my hard work without even trying to talk it over.

I'm also incredibly concerned you have made these deletions without consulting me or anyone else.

Hi FinB2000 - are you sure this is a wise edit? All of these structures are separate buildings and while editing the geometry as you've done provides one clean structure, it removes the precision with which units are identified. As some are historic buildings it seems to be it is preferable to keep them individually, and their geometry as of previous edits was not in any way 'wrong'? Furthermore your edits to the bus station seem incorrect as they have removed individual bus lanes. Good practice I've seen elsewhere is to identify bus platforms with each lane.

No worries, Fin. Yes I hope to get around to some housing areas soon.