Hello mueschel,

Thank you for the heads-up. It looks like I accidentally modified a key and left it when I uploaded. I have corrected those instances to use the standard crossing:markings=lines and removed the errant crossing:lines=no tag. Thanks for helping keep the data clean!

VLD322

Added pedestrian infrastructure and crossings.

Added pedestrian infrastructure and crossings.

Ok, agora compreendo. Muito obrigado pela resposta rápida e desejo-lhe uma excelente tarde.

Olá — reparei que adicionou códigos postais como extensão do nome da rua em algumas partes da cidade de Jequi. Gostaria apenas de comentar, caso seja útil, que no OpenStreetMap, os códigos postais são normalmente mapeados como um valor da chave [addr:postcode](addr:postcode=*), em vez de serem incluídos no nome da rua.

Ficaria extremamente grato se pudesse adotar esta abordagem daqui para a frente, pois ajuda a manter a consistência com a forma como os códigos postais são mapeados noutras cidades do Brasil.

Hello rskedgell,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. We make a concerted effort to regularly update the sidewalk tags, but it appears that way/1459147016 was overlooked. I will ensure that way is updated accordingly. Thank you for reaching out.

Best Regards,
Logan

Hello Benoît,

Thank you for reaching out and making the appropriate corrections. I thought I had avoided the area under construction, but apparently not. I apologize for any inconvenience.

Best wishes, Logan

I really appreciate your confirmation. Thank you for the comment and hope you have a fantastic day!

Hello Benoît,

I had initially set foot=no because, on rare occasions, bicycles and pedestrians share the same area for crossing. However, since bicycles already have the implied foot=no in accordance with regulations in France, I will refrain from tagging them as such so moving forward. Thank you for reaching out to me and sharing this information with me. Very helpful.

Best Regards,
Logan

Thank you for reaching out to me. I appreciate the positive contributions you have made in this area. If I recall correctly, this was one of my first interactions with your edits. Upon reviewing the quality of your other work, I revisited this and made the necessary corrections. I sincerely value your recommendation with regards to OSM history and I will keep this in mind for future edits. Wishing you a good day.