Hello,

This modification was made in response to the pictogram on the side of the road showing a bicycle and a left turn arrow. Typically, this indicates that the intersection is designated for bicycles. After reviewing and factoring your concern, I have restored way/1530686862 to a track road and removed the crossing tags accordingly. The nodes have been retained to facilitate routing for both vehicle types. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

Thank you for the feedback. Happy Mapping!

Hello citrula,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The removal of the barrier=kerb tagging here was unintentional. I have reverted the changeset to re-add the tags. Thank you!

VLD277

Hello iandees,

Thank you for catching my mistake here. I made one additional update to make sure the crossing is returned to the correct position as well. Changeset # 179606834

Thanks and happy mapping, VLD277

Hello Tejas Gandviya,

We have observed that you added a name to an intersection node. Based on your changeset comment, it appears the name corresponds to a shop. Typically, nodes containing shop information should be positioned at the actual physical location of the shop, as seen in imagery, rather than on the intersection of roadways. When adding a shop node, including the shop=* tag would be helpful. Here is a link to the wiki page for the shop=* tag for your reference. We have removed the name from the intersection node accordingly.

Happy Mapping,
VLD277

shop=*

Good morning, Mateusz,

You are correct, that is a typo and was meant to be area:highway=traffic_island. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. I have made the correction in changeset # 178101356 .

Cheers
Susan (VLD 277)

Hello silversurfer83,

The southern culvert is visible in bing streetside imagery, however in hindsight I realize that I should not have added the north one at Midnight Lane as it is very difficult to confirm for certain. I have removed it and will leave that location for locals to verify and resolve. Apologies for any inconvenience.

Thanks, Susan

Thank you, Udar. Happy mapping to you as well.

Good morning Benoit,

Thank you for reaching out regarding my edits on la rue Didot and making the necessary corrections. I am always striving to improve and your feedback is appreciated.

Sincerely, Susan (VLD277)

Bonjour Benoît,

Thank you for reaching out and for making the necessary adjustments. Apologies for using an outdated imagery here - I will be more careful going forward. I appreciate your feedback!

Susan, VLD277

Hello Mateusz,

I screwed up with this tag. It has now been updated. Thank you for bringing this to my attention; I had overlooked it.
Susan (VLD277)

Hello MaliMrav. Thank you for looking into that.

Hi DK. Thank you for reaching out regarding this changeset. I went in and updated per your suggestion. I will keep this in mind in the future.
Susan

Thank you for your response. I made the edits as we discussed. Thank you for the collaboration.

Hello. I am looking at the tagging for way/1282505190 and would like to remove the access=no tag and change the emergency=designated tag to emergency=yes and would like to add vehicle=no and foot=yes tags so the footway can be removed and there will no longer be an overlapping highway issue. What do you think about this solution?

Hi MxxCon,
The highway=crossing tag here was initially removed based on guidance from the informal crossings OSM wiki page. crossing=informal?uselang=en When taking a 2nd look at this one, I found a lowered curb so I went ahead and changed it back to an unmarked crossing in this case. Thanks for reaching out

Hello MxxCon,
Thank you for reaching out. I found a lowered curb here that I hadn’t noticed on my initial edit, so I have changed this crossing back to unmarked. For reference, the highway=crossing tag was initially removed based on the OSM wiki recommendation for informal crossings. crossing=informal?uselang=en

Hi bishnuvimaljhaIITBHU,

I was wondering about this feature, is this supposed to be named "Dr Narayan Jha's House"? I was wondering because privacy standards on OSM normally regulate against placing personal information of people on OSM. Is this also where this person runs their business? Thank you!

Hello,
Thank you for pointing this out and addressing the issue as needed. I appreciate your feedback and will take your comments into consideration in the future. Feel free to reach out with any questions.
Thanks,
VLD277

Hello Aabirammuru. In looking at this changeset, it appears to have the names of the people living in these homes. Attached is a link from OSM which lists the limitations of mapping private information. https://fburl.com/n3wvzlcf
If you wish, I can remove the names, or would you prefer to?