I added the missing way to the Somerset relations - ceremonial and traditional.

The Somerset boundary is not closed; there is a gap by the town of Clevedon, west of Bristol.

In agreement that the note referring to the block in the estuary is correct for the ceremonial city. The original editor mentioned it appeared on a plugin, is there a lack of clarity on the multiple shapes available - if they needed the land-only boundary, Relation: Bristol (5746665) should be used - I may add that to the note.

Without any checks a year plus back, a contributor uploaded the wrong shape. Then another added the ISO code to this wrong shape. That needs removing and the polygon relabelled as historic.

Aleks - please be aware, this is not the current boundary, it changed 10 years ago so I have removed the Wikidata code. Once the latest is added then feel free to add the code to it. Thanks

I've removed the Wiki entries as this boundary is not the current Belfast limits.

Reverting as the edit labelled the admin boundary as a bus route

changeset/161765115

Multiple OSM relations with one wikidata breaks how Kartographer displays them at Wikipedia. The wikipedia tag doesn't have the same number of shapes so it's less noticeable. The tag guidance notes don't seem to outlaw having it on multiple, but could put a secondary tag on the lesser used ones to differentiate them.

Multiple OSM relations with one wikidata breaks how Kartographer displays them at Wikipedia. The wikipedia tag doesn't have the same number of shapes so it's less noticeable. The tag guidance notes don't seem to outlaw having it on multiple, but could put a secondary tag on the lesser used ones to differentiate them.

Hi Phil, it was a desperate attempt to force the Shropshire shapes into Wikidata as they are not showing in Wikipedia when I use the Q numbers. I have set it back to what it was originally (still doesn't work!)