Reverted in #62305109 vandalism removal

Reverted in #62305092 vandalism removal

Reverted in #62305076 vandalism removal

Reverted in #62305054 vandalism removal

Thanks for the explanation. PS: it's best practice, though not enforced, to add a "source" field to the edits when saving, Indicating on what the edits were based on, that can be a simple as "survey" for things that are from direct inspection.

Hi and welcome to OSM. I notice that you removed a name from the road that you have previously added, but left the place=town tag that is likely wrong too (the place tag together with the name should either be on a node or on an area).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62246949

Node restored in changeset/62205729
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62194473

Hi and welcome to OSM. Please don't add English names in non English
speaking countries except where there is a community consensus to do so. If there us a widely used English name you can add that to the name:en tag. Thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62202965

Hi and welcome to OSM. I noticed that you deleted a node marking some historic ruins in your edits, was that really intentional? See node/278472729/history
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62194473

I've reverted the place name change for now in changeset/62182140#map=19/43.14667/-88.30676

Hi and welcome to OSM. You've changed a name of a place, is there a specific source or reason for this change?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62168489

Hi and welcome to OSM, a further question: is the town simply planned or what is its status?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62158981

Hi and welcome to OSM.

You changed a place node name from "Merton" to "Not Merton", that is unlikely to be the correct name. If the place doesn't actually exist you should simply delete the node in question. If there is another problem we can surely get to the bottom of it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62154483

Reverted in changeset/61870315

Further question: do you have opening hours information? That would clearly be useful to add.

Hi the duplication of objects is not tragic, but should be cleaned up. I think we can assume that the information added itself is ok, so the cleanup would simply involve merging the additional data in to the original object and then removing the added object (naturally only in cases where the library was already present).

Hallo bjc

Bei diesem und anderen changesets gibts du "geodienste.ch" als Quelle an. Wenn es auch Datensätze auf geodienste.ch gibt die wir tatsächlich nutzen können (z..B. Kanton Wallis), ist es nicht generell so. Kannst du bitte generell bessere Angaben zum verwendeten Datensatz machen, und bei Unklarheiten dich and die talk-ch Liste wenden.

Ansonsten gibt es für den Kanton Bern durchaus Datensätze die wir nutzen dürfen, die beziehen wir aber direkt vom Kanton, siehe osm.wiki/Canton_of_Bern_Address_Import und osm.wiki/Switzerland/Datasources#Compliant_sources_from_Cantons

Danke

I've removed the trail names (after reverting the two changesets) and added access=private to the paths in question.

BUT the ways were part of the route relations Alpe-Adria-Trail and Soška Pot from which I've removed them too. Both the routes seem to be broken (which is however seems to have been the case before) and should be fixed by somebody with the requisite knowledge.

Reverted in changeset/61261474#map=17/46.37803/13.74660&layers=NG

Reverted in changeset/61261474#map=17/46.37803/13.74660&layers=NG