Schramme's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by Schramme
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5503870 | DoNotSpam | "No Gates there"
|
|||
| 5503869 | DoNotSpam | "No Gates there..."
|
|||
| 5441061 | becker + flögge dauerhaft geschlossen? |
||||
| 5492471 | Schaltkreis | Unable to answer "Wo befindet sich dieser Defibrillator?" – draußen: Defibrillator – node/6482681968 via StreetComplete 63.4: Nicht existent: Dopplung mit Defibrillator 9m südöstlich |
|||
| 5492774 | Schaltkreis | Unable to answer "Existiert das hier noch?" – Altera (Restaurant) – node/2897684739 via StreetComplete 63.4: Ausgeschildert als Hotel |
|||
| 5475621 | Das Haus wurde abgerissen und das Grundstück mit zwei neuen Doppelhäusern bebaut. |
||||
| 5475617 | Diese Baulücke ist inzwischen geschlossen durch ein Doppelhaus. |
||||
| 5467505 | lufticus | "nicht mehr da"
|
|||
| 5507950 | Das Unternehmen ist nicht Expert MegaLand sondern Expert Westküste. |
||||
| 5510599 | Mateusz Konieczny | way/676724405/history is tagged as building = proposed Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here. |