Rukkhadevata's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175137330 | 22 days ago | Hong Kong is divided into three traditional areas which do not have administrative status: HKI, Kowloon, and the New Territories. However, locals in Hong Kong seem to think that "Hong Kong" refers only to Hong Kong Island, while "Kowloon" is a separate part. Given that Hong Kong's situation differs from that of mainland China, where different districts within the same city have their own governments with real power, whereas in Hong Kong there are none, I think perhaps the place node "Kowloon" should be removed, or it should be changed to =region. |
| 174595004 | 28 days ago | 是的,自治州不用渲染,因为它不像县有县城,而只有“州政府驻地”,纯粹是一个跟“青海省”一样的区域型地名 |
| 174595004 | 28 days ago | |
| 173359340 | about 2 months ago | Thanks for pointing out my mistake! It should be "ele" and I have fixed it in #173517027. |
| 169045928 | 5 months ago | Hi katpatuka,
|
| 160164489 | about 1 year ago | Hello! According to Chinese tagging guidelines (osm.wiki/Zh-hans:%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97#%E5%90%8D%E7%A7%B0%E4%B8%8E%E5%90%8D%E8%AF%8D), names of automonous counties should not use names that are not commonly used by local, so I restored their names. |
| 147263727 | over 1 year ago | 您好,请问能否提供大丰上海农场的边界来源? |
| 150394579 | over 1 year ago | 您好,请问您是处于何种考量删除了此节点?(胶南确实已于2012年撤销,但其建成区仍独立于黄岛区本体,故作为试验设置) |
| 150452476 | over 1 year ago | 您好,街道的标签应该是 place=town 或 place=suburb,区县的则应该是 place=city |
| 149680556 | over 1 year ago | Source
|
| 149135416 | over 1 year ago | Hello @Phong Pham Thanh, This changeset involves the Paracel Islands, which are disputed territories. Disputed territories usually labeled in the language of the country that actually controls the territory; information about territorial disputes is typically noted in administrative relations and tags. Paracel Islands are currently under the actual control of China. Therefore, elements on them should be labeled primarily in Chinese. Therefore, I will restore some of the damaged data because OSM follows the “de facto” principle. If you still have questions, feel free to communicate. Sincerely, @Rukkhadevata |
| 148592984 | almost 2 years ago | Hello @PPETS,
|
| 148470770 | almost 2 years ago | Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20240310164232/https://www.fxqhm.gov.cn/content/2019/219020.html |
| 146586814 | almost 2 years ago | 您好!行政区边界的subarea成员应同为行政区边界,node(节点)是不应作为其subarea成员存在的 |
| 143220120 | about 2 years ago | 您好,如果获得的行政区边界数据不能闭合,就不应创建关系 |
| 142698044 | about 2 years ago | 您好,如果获得的行政区边界数据不能闭合,就不应创建关系 |
| 127630367 | about 2 years ago | 您好,如果获得的行政区边界数据不能闭合,就不应创建关系 |
| 140658836 | over 2 years ago | According to the on the ground principle of OSM, this boundary is consistent with the actual situation (i.e. the actual jurisdiction area of the local authorities in the two provinces). |
| 140536747 | over 2 years ago | In China, place=suburb is mainly used to tag the next-level division (admin_level=8) of districts and counties in urban built-up areas (with place:CN=subdistrict). If administrative divisions at level 8 are outside urban built-up areas, their labels will be marked as place=town.
|
| 140536747 | over 2 years ago | In China, "districts" are not necessarily part of a city, especially those transformed from counties(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_(China)).
|