OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Outdoorrookie's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by Outdoorrookie

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
5117007 Outdoorrookie

Treppe macht einen Bogen
Recycling

via StreetComplete 62.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/322880.jpg

5116997 Outdoorrookie

Infotafel

via StreetComplete 62.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/322876.jpg

5116979 Outdoorrookie

Luft und Strom Furt Velos

via StreetComplete 62.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/322875.jpg

5116975 Outdoorrookie

Velunterstand

via StreetComplete 62.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/322874.jpg

5116973 Outdoorrookie

Wartsaal

via StreetComplete 62.1

5116972 Outdoorrookie

KIS

via StreetComplete 62.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/322873.jpg

5116971 Outdoorrookie

Diverses

via StreetComplete 62.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/322872.jpg

5116799 Outdoorrookie

Picnic Platz Grillstelle mit Hütte

via StreetComplete 62.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/322860.jpg

5116225 Taktaal

The "place=village" here is named with a combined name. In other towns in Switzerland this isn't done, like in Illnau-Effretikon or Arth-Goldau we still label the two population centers separately even if they share a train station.

I'm not that familiar with the situation in this area of the country but is there a reason why the town names are combined here?

Does anyone disagree with splitting the town labels into the two population centers similar to how this is done in other places? I'd of course leave the municipal boundaries as they are, and only change the village nodes.

5114585 Outdoorrookie

BAUSTELLE

via StreetComplete 62.1