Hi TOGA,
as the appended document states the power line in Québec really has only 315 kV. Probably I've mistakenly changed voltages with JOSM filters even outside Québec.
Sorry for that!

Hallo wsoroe,

ich habe gerade gesehen, dass du ohne Kommentar ( changeset/63933311 ) den Änderungssatz eines neuen Users rückgängig gemacht hast.

Ich habe mal mit frischen Sentinel-2-Satellitenbildern geschaut und festgestellt, dass die gelöschten Lagertanks tatsächlich nicht mehr existieren.

Außerdem hast du lauter Wikidata-Duplikate wieder eingeführt, die andere Leute mit viel Fleiß auflösen (müssen).

Ich bitte um eine Stellungnahme von dir.

Viele Grüße

Hi Marc Konuhi,

why have you introduced a wrong tagging of this national park (which is a protected area and has nothing to do with inner-city "parks") boundary=national_park ?

Thanks. Do you know, that you might be one of the most hurried mappers? Keep cool, the map will keep us working for the next 50 years ;)

How do you know the voltage of 161 kV?

What have you done here? You've tagged a forest as power line: way/239523257/history

Please fix this immediately!

Szia!

why have you deleted my farmlands? See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63940886 for visualization.

I don't see so much "poor mapping" - may you please explain this a little bit more?

Have you introduced the bump in way/70742239 ?

Because the switchgrid of the substation looked demolished to me. Cool, if you could verify this!

I'm everywhere ;) - and interested in your background. May you be so kind to write me a PM?

Bonjour PierZen,

have you really been using "Lakewalker" at way/594283985 ?

Best,
OTM

and Suzano, Brazil

This is no roof: way/463759977
Congrats to your 6000. changeset!

Hi Luke,

on newer DigitalGlobe imagery way/365634891 seems demolished. May you please check this?

Sorry for my broken layout.

Hi James,

why have you create (at least) 3 broken relations?
* ttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7638521
* relation/7638522
* relation/7638520

If you are not going to fix them, I think they should better be deleted.

I haven't invented this tag. With this change I would like to mark features, which are not getting used, but were only built for military training. Meddling up the UK and the Germany changes was not intended, sorry!

I've used the hi-res aerial photos from DigitalGlobe as imagery.

Hi Kees, may you please not use building=yes for brick works?