OneC's Comments
| Changeset | Кайчан | Шәрех |
|---|---|---|
| 165361931 | 8 ай элек | As an area editor, Thank you for the detailed write up of edits, too many editors just say..."change the area" LOL |
| 165385917 | 8 ай элек | Apologies on the comment, when I was checking the ravines a few weeks ago there was no new paths, that clearly has changed. I am adding the path back. It is hopeful that the heavy equipment path remains. |
| 165385917 | 8 ай элек | Please avoid modifying areas that you have no knowledge of. The modifications that you have made do not exist. |
| 135481093 | 2 елдан артыграк элек | GeorgeS - I have changed all of the entries from track to path. Once a way is a track with a name, it will become part of a routing engine and may not be accurate.
|
| 135069670 | 2 елдан артыграк элек | edit: completed north of South Ridge Road |
| 134788065 | 2 елдан артыграк элек | Hi GeorgeS - do you have GPS data for the Snowmobile Trail (75) that takes the path up to Derbyshire Rd?
|
| 115403330 | 3 ел элек диярлек | The function of the three ways that were changed to service are either a business or park/campsite. Although Sugar Shack could be a combination service and driveway since there is a single residence further up. Limerick could be Residential with access=private/destination since there are do not enter signs or access=driveway with driveway=pipestem, I guess I forgot that tag Mears I suppose could be Service, since it is a business but since it is also a Private road with two residences, chose Driveway and intended driveway=pipestem, but missed entering it. and I suppose ownership=private should be added to all but one listed |
| 133456788 | 3 ел элек диярлек | hello TAYbalt - I have updated New Bold Square back to access=yes; the use of access=private should only be used where the general public is not permitted without prior authorization. An apartment/condo complex is a publicly accessible venue. The most restrictive that a site such as this should be access=permissive or maybe access=customer.
|
| 131060963 | 3 ел элек диярлек | option 3 is in use now, after I had responded, I considered that option. Much cleaner to resemble the adjoining roads.
|
| 131060963 | 3 ел элек диярлек | JessAk71 - Just another question that I am curious about. How were you made aware of the updates that I had made? Was there an alert of some type that you received?
|
| 131060963 | 3 ел элек диярлек | Hi JessAk71 - Thanks for the review, I understand your point. If you feel it is important to change to access=yes then provide the restrictive level of *mode=no then I will do that.
|
| 115482846 | якынча 4 ел элек | Hi ezekielf - I've reviewed all of the Town of Arlington Private roads and adjusted most all to be highway=service highway=driveway && access=yes or access=permissive. it was a good exercise to revisit due to many alignment issues Thanks |
| 115482846 | якынча 4 ел элек | Hi ezekielf, I will review the changes made. The changes are per the P designation from the Town of Arlington website. Granted a few of these are Private roads to a business where it may be better access=permissive and ownership=private. But, a majority are labeled as PVT at the driveway entrance, this is understood to be Do Not Enter unless authorized or making a delivery. Thanks |
| 92718437 | 4 елдан артыграк элек | updated to be less restrictive: previous was access=no and vehicles=yes; adjusted to access=yes and foot=no and bicycle=no |
| 92718437 | 4 елдан артыграк элек | Hey compdude, which street are you referring to? |