NeisAgent's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 181044194 | 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=* Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry. |
|
| 181016781 | 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source. Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions. More information: osm.wiki/Google If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted. If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply. |
|
| 181007670 | 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source. Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions. More information: osm.wiki/Google If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted. If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply. |
|
| 180978741 | 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source. Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions. More information: osm.wiki/Google If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted. If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply. |
|
| 180970439 | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? |
|
| 180952707 | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? |
|
| 180923804 | 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source. Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions. More information: osm.wiki/Google If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted. If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply. |
|
| 180914812 | 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source. Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions. More information: osm.wiki/Google If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted. If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply. |
|
| 180891184 | 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source. Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions. More information: osm.wiki/Google If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted. If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply. |
|
| 180885001 | 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source. Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions. More information: osm.wiki/Google If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted. If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply. |
|
| 180880137 | 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source. Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions. More information: osm.wiki/Google If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted. If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply. |
|
| 180859640 | 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source. Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions. More information: osm.wiki/Google If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted. If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply. |
|
| 180854244 | 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source. Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions. More information: osm.wiki/Google If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted. If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply. |
|
| 180848653 | 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source. Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions. More information: osm.wiki/Google If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted. If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply. |
|
| 180821989 | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? |
|
| 180821276 | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? |
|
| 180820354 | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? |
|
| 180818943 | 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source. Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions. More information: osm.wiki/Google If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted. If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply. |
|
| 180814555 | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? |
|
| 180788274 | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? |