MichaelCollinson's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 116561042 | about 3 years ago | Thank you! Yes, it is the Down's Estate Community Project aka Down's Community Farm. I was probably ohing and ahing about how to tag it. Have put it as landuse=farmland but could equally be farmyard or something more appropriate to its community nature. |
| 36228980 | over 3 years ago | I visited the outside of the building, so the information MIGHT have come from a sign or inscription. But unfortunately no photo and it was 6+ years ago and I no longer live in the area so I cannot say for sure. |
| 121856163 | over 3 years ago | Thanks and fixed. |
| 121856163 | over 3 years ago | Thanks. Typo for "ruined". Two instances corrected, third not found. |
| 118627943 | over 3 years ago | FYI, I am the orginal mapper of the path as a cycleway ( but have not been back recently). There were clear cycleway signs at both ends of St Andrews Court. It is not 100% clear whether then apply to the road or the footpath. The footpath itself is indeed very narrow and unmarked (though that happens elsewhere in east Melbourne too). On the other hand, why mark an unremarkable residential road as a cycleway, it does not make sense. |
| 69803247 | almost 4 years ago | Thank you Bernard. The are no obvious boundary walls for the north and east, so I have removed it. (a node with the name remains so it can still be searched for) Happy Mapping, Mike |
| 115115901 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, I am aware that some paths in the area have been mistakenly marked bicycle=no. I am now in the area and carefully verifying by ground survey. In this instance, the path is obviously not "associated with a road" (i.e. not a VIC sidewalk), is habitually used by and fit for cyclists as a secondary use and has no explicit prohibition (despite other signage). |
| 116561042 | almost 4 years ago | Thank you. A typo. Now corrected |
| 115465809 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Diacritic,
FYI, I am cycling all the trails that you mention daily on my current work commute (Seaford-Cheltenham). Unfortunately I don't have a bracket to mount a phone for Kartaview capture; I'll see what I can do. |
| 115465809 | almost 4 years ago | Hi again Diacritic. Would you point me to the "official" definition of the Bay Trail? The southern end is sign posted with 3 sign posts (verified still there) as going under Pompei Bridge and links to Mordialloc Creek trail. You've moved it to terminate in the middle of a busy road junction and there is no signage there (also verified). I'd like to move it back for safety and routing but want to consult with you first. The ambivalence I see is that the portion under the bridge may formally belong to the Mordialloc Creek path. |
| 116318331 | almost 4 years ago | Hi,
|
| 115663410 | almost 4 years ago | I did and corrected now. |
| 20695020 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Ivan, Thank you for pointing this out. I have certainly made a mistake in moving the name "Ailinglaplap Atoll" from a duplicate node to the island polygon "place" tag instead of "name". What I forget is how I worked out the correct name. I will try and verify that from a non-copyright source before correcting it - there is a US library resource that I used I think. /Michael |
| 64613269 | about 4 years ago | A bit late to the party on this one, but the intent is to convey to the end user not other mappers that these are mine shafts or probably mine shafts, (I originally proposed "description"!). Using name when it generic is arguable, though OS certainly do; I can't see any problem with description. Final intent is to have an app that alerts interesting features when walking. |
| 12108 | over 4 years ago | Thank you for letting me know. As you have ground truthed it, I am happy with the change - as you say, it is most likely way/91885545 |
| 107823945 | over 4 years ago | Thanks Lee, yes, exactly that. Corrected now. If you live in or frequently visit the area, some GPS tracks would be great. The different sets of aerial imagery all have different alignments and the tracks are super useful for correcting that. |
| 105975970 | over 4 years ago | Hi mueschel, thanks, fixed. |
| 102774916 | over 4 years ago | Thanks. Whoops! Fixed. |
| 31288456 | over 4 years ago | en name deleted |
| 49169 | over 4 years ago | PS. And perhaps highway=service, service=alley may be now more appropriate for the original way itself? Perhaps Belle Vue Terrace also? |